Recent Advances in the Classification and Treatment of Ependymomas

被引:0
作者
Heather Leeper
Michelle M. Felicella
Tobias Walbert
机构
[1] NorthShore University Health System,Department of Neurology
[2] Henry Ford Health System,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
[3] Henry Ford Health System,Departments of Neurosurgery and Neurology
来源
Current Treatment Options in Oncology | 2017年 / 18卷
关键词
Ependymoma; Management; Molecular classification; Treatment; Brain tumor; Central nervous system;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Ependymomas are a subgroup of ependymal glia-derived neoplasms that affect children as well as adults. Arising within any CNS compartment, symptoms at presentation can range from acute onset due to increased intracranial pressure to insidious myelopathy. The overall survival (OS) outcomes in adult patients across the subgroups is heterogeneous with subependymoma having an excellent prognosis often even in the absence of any treatment, whereas supratentorial ependymomas tend to be higher grade in nature and may have an OS of 5 years despite gross total resection and adjuvant radiation. The rarity of ependymal tumors, together still only representing 1.8% of all primary CNS tumors, has been a long-standing challenge in defining optimal treatment guidelines via prospective randomized trials. Retrospective studies have supported maximal safe resection, ideally gross total resection, as the optimal treatment with adjuvant radiation therapy proffering additional tumor control. The evidence for efficacy of chemotherapy and targeted agents in adult ependymomas is minimal. Recent investigations of the molecular, genetic, and DNA methylation profiles of ependymal tumors across all age groups and CNS compartments have identified distinct oncogenic gene products as well as nine molecular subgroups correlating with similar outcomes. The 2016 World Health Organization of Tumors of the Central Nervous System update addresses some of these findings, although their clinical significance has not yet been fully validated. There are inconsistent survival outcomes in retrospective studies for ependymomas graded as II versus III, bringing into question the validity of histologic grading which is subject to high interobserver variability in part due to inconsistent application of mitotic count parameters.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 218 条
[1]  
Ostrom QT(2016)American Brain Tumor Association adolescent and young adult primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2008-2012 Neuro-Oncology 18 i1-i50
[2]  
Gittleman H(2015)Molecular classification of ependymal tumors across all CNS compartments, histopathological grades, and age groups Cancer Cell 27 728-743
[3]  
de Blank PM(2016)Biology and management of ependymomas Neuro-Oncology 18 902-913
[4]  
Finlay JL(1991)The prognostic significance of postoperative residual tumor in ependymoma Neurosurgery 28 666-671
[5]  
Gurney JG(2007)Multicentric French study on adult intracranial ependymomas: prognostic factors analysis and therapeutic considerations from a cohort of 152 patients Brain 130 1338-1349
[6]  
McKean-Cowdin R(2002)Intracranial ependymomas: an analysis of prognostic factors and patterns of failure Am JClin Oncol 25 117-122
[7]  
Pajtler KW(2015)Clinical course and progression-free survival of adult intracranial and spinal ependymoma patients Neuro-Oncology 17 440-447
[8]  
Witt H(2017)Clinical presentation and outcomes for adult ependymoma patients Cancer 123 494-501
[9]  
Sill M(2015)Symptoms and socio-economic impact of ependymoma on adult patients: results of the adult ependymoma outcomes project 2 J Neuro-Oncol 121 341-348
[10]  
Jones DT(1999)Clinicopathologic study of 61 patients with ependymoma including MIB-1 immunohistochemistry Ann Diagn Pathol 3 11-18