Health-related quality of life after TBI: a systematic review of study design, instruments, measurement properties, and outcome

被引:0
作者
Suzanne Polinder
Juanita A Haagsma
David van Klaveren
Ewout W Steyerberg
Ed F van Beeck
机构
[1] Department of Public Health,Erasmus MC
来源
Population Health Metrics | / 13卷
关键词
Traumatic brain injury; Systematic review; Health-related quality of life; Functional outcome; Methodology;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Measurement of health-related quality of life (HRQL) is essential to quantify the subjective burden of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in survivors. We performed a systematic review of HRQL studies in TBI to evaluate study design, instruments used, methodological quality, and outcome. Fifty-eight studies were included, showing large variation in HRQL instruments and assessment time points used. The Short Form-36 (SF-36) was most frequently used. A high prevalence of health problems during and after the first year of TBI was a common finding of the studies included. In the long term, patients with a TBI still showed large deficits from full recovery compared to population norms. Positive results for internal consistency and interpretability of the SF-36 were reported in validity studies. The Quality of Life after Brain Injury instrument (QOLIBRI), European Brain Injury Questionnaire (EBIQ), Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ), and the World Health Organization Quality of Life short version (WHOQOL-BREF) showed positive results, but evidence was limited. Meta-analysis of SF-36 showed that TBI outcome is heterogeneous, encompassing a broad spectrum of HRQL, with most problems reported in the physical, emotional, and social functioning domain. The use of SF-36 in combination with a TBI-specific instrument, i.e., QOLIBRI, seems promising. Consensus on preferred methodologies of HRQL measurement in TBI would facilitate comparability across studies, resulting in improved insights in recovery patterns and better estimates of the burden of TBI.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 363 条
[1]  
Shukla D(2011)Outcome measures for traumatic brain injury Clin Neurol Neurosurg 113 435-41
[2]  
Devi B(2003)Measuring the public health impact of injuries Epidemiol Rev 25 3-19
[3]  
Agrawal A(2007)Guidelines for the conduction of follow-up studies measuring injury-related disability J Trauma 62 534-50
[4]  
Segui-Gomez M(2012)Early management of severe traumatic brain injury Lancet 22 1088-98
[5]  
Mackenzie EJ(2012)Traumatic brain injury in Spanish-speaking individuals: research findings and clinical implications Brain Inj 26 801-4
[6]  
Van Beeck EF(2011)Measuring functional and quality of life outcomes following major head injury: common scales and checklists Injury 42 281-7
[7]  
Larsen CF(1995)Position paper from the World Health Organization Soc Sci Med 41 1403-9
[8]  
Lyons RA(2005)Assessing health-related quality of life after severe brain damage: potentials and limitations Prog Brain Res 150 545-53
[9]  
Meerding WJ(2005)Assessment of health-related quality of life in persons after traumatic brain injury - development of the Qolibri, a specific measure Acta Neurochir Suppl 93 43-9
[10]  
Mulder S(1999)Quality of life after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of the literature Restor Neurol Neurosci 14 93-102