Learning best-practices in journalology: Course description and attendee insights into the inaugural EQUATOR Canada Publication School

被引:8
作者
Galica J. [1 ]
Chee-A-Tow A. [2 ]
Gupta S. [3 ]
Jaiswal A. [3 ]
Monsour A. [2 ]
Tricco A.C. [4 ,5 ]
Cobey K.D. [6 ,7 ,8 ]
Butcher N.J. [2 ]
机构
[1] School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston
[2] Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto
[3] School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston
[4] Epidemiology Division, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto
[5] Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto
[6] Centre for Journalology, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa
[7] School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa
[8] Department of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling
关键词
Medical education; Publication science; Reporting quality; Scholarly communications;
D O I
10.1186/s12919-018-0155-4
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background and purpose: Dissemination of research results is a key component of the research continuum and is commonly achieved through publication in peer-reviewed academic journals. However, issues of poor quality reporting in the research literature are well documented. A lack of formal training in journalology (i.e., publication science) may contribute to this problem. To help address this gap in training, the Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research (EQUATOR) Canada Publication School was developed and facilitated by internationally-renowned faculty to train researchers and clinicians in reporting and publication best practices. This article describes the structure of the inaugural course and provides an overview of attendee evaluations and perspectives. Key highlights: Attendees perceived the content of this two-day intensive course as highly informative. They noted that the course helped them learn skills that were relevant to academic publishing (e.g., using reporting guidelines in all phases of the research process; using scholarly metrics beyond the journal impact factor; open-access publication models; and engaging patients in the research process). The course provided an opportunity for researchers to share their challenges faced during the publication process and to learn skills for improving reproducibility, completeness, transparency, and dissemination of research results. There was some suggestion that this type of course should be offered and integrated into formal training and course curricula. Implications: In light of the importance of academic publishing in the scientific process, there is a need to train and prepare researchers with skills in Journalology. The EQUATOR Canada Publication School provides an example of a successful program that addressed the needs of researchers across career trajectories and provided them with resources to be successful in the publication process. This approach can be used, modified, and/or adapted by curriculum developers interested in designing similar programs, and could be incorporated into academic and clinical research training programs. © 2018 The Author(s).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Wilson P.M., Petticrew M., Calnan M.W., Nazareth I., Disseminating research findings: What should researchers do? A systematic scoping review of conceptual frameworks, Implement Sci., (2010)
[2]  
Liberati A., An unfinished trip through uncertainties, BMJ, 328, (2004)
[3]  
Chan Aw S., Increasing value and reducing waste: Addressing inaccessible research, Lancet, (2014)
[4]  
Liberati A., So many questions, so few answers, Interview by les Olson. Bull World Health Organ, (2010)
[5]  
Scherer R.W., Langenberg P., Von Elm E., Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, (2007)
[6]  
Glasziou P., Altman D.G., Bossuyt P., Boutron I., Clarke M., Julious S., Et al., Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research, Lancet, (2014)
[7]  
Chalmers I., Glasziou P., Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence, Lancet, 374, pp. 86-89, (2009)
[8]  
Galipeau J., Moher D., Campbell C., Hendry P., Cameron D.W., Palepu A., Et al., A systematic review highlights a knowledge gap regarding the effectiveness of health-related training programs in journalology, J Clin Epidemiol, (2015)
[9]  
Keen A., Writing for publication: Pressures, barriers and support strategies, Nurse Educ Today, (2007)
[10]  
Aitchison C., Catterall J., Ross P., Burgin S., Tough love and tears": Learning doctoral writing in the sciences, High Educ Res Dev., (2012)