Lung and diaphragm ultrasound as predictors of success in weaning from mechanical ventilation

被引：52

作者：

Tenza-Lozano E. ^{[1
]}

Llamas-Alvarez A. ^{[1
]}

Jaimez-Navarro E. ^{[1
]}

Fernández-Sánchez J. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Intensive Care Unit, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Elche General University Hospital, Camino de la Almazara 11, Elche

[2] Department of Clinical Medicine, Miguel Hernandez University, Sant Joan d’Alacant

来源：

Critical Ultrasound Journal | 2018年 / 10卷 / 1期

关键词：

Diaphragm ultrasound; Lung ultrasound; Weaning; Withdrawal of mechanical ventilation;

D O I：

10.1186/s13089-018-0094-3

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Background: Lung and diaphragm ultrasound methods have recently been introduced to predict the outcome of weaning from mechanical ventilation (MV). The aim of this study is to assess the reliability and accuracy of these techniques for predicting successful weaning in critically ill adults. Methods: We conducted two studies: a cross-sectional interobserver agreement study between two sonographers and a prospective cohort study to assess the accuracy of lung and diaphragm ultrasound for predicting weaning and extubation outcome. For the interobserver agreement study, we included 50 general critical care patients who were consecutively admitted to the ICU. For the predictive accuracy study, we included consecutively 69 patients on MV who were ready for weaning. We assessed interobserver agreement of ultrasound measurements, using the weighted kappa coefficient for LUSm score (modified lung ultrasound score) and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland–Altman method for TI (diaphragm thickening index). We assessed the predictive value of LUSm and TI in weaning outcome by plotting the corresponding ROC curves. Results: We found adequate interobserver agreement for both LUSm (weighted kappa 0.95) and TI (ICC 0.78, difference according to Bland–Altman analysis ± 12.5%). LUSm showed good-moderate discriminative power for successful weaning and extubation (area under the ROC curve (AUC) for successful weaning 0.80, and sensitivity and specificity at optimal cut-off point 0.76 and 0.73, respectively; AUC for successful extubation 0.78, and optimal sensitivity and specificity 0.76 and 0.47, respectively. TI was more sensitive but less specific for predicting successful weaning (AUC 0.71, optimal sensitivity and specificity 0.93 and 0.48) and successful extubation (AUC 0.76, optimal sensitivity and specificity 0.93 and 0.58). The area under the ROC curve for predicting weaning success was 0.83 for both ultrasound measurements together. Conclusions: Interobserver agreement was excellent for LUSm and moderate-good for TI. A low TI value or high LUSm value indicates high risk of weaning failure. © 2018, The Author(s).

引用

共 40 条

[1]

Penuelas O., Frutos-Vivar F., Fernandez C., Anzueto A., Epstein S.K., Apezteguia C., Et al., Characteristics and outcomes of ventilated patients according to time to liberation from mechanical ventilation, Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 184, 4, pp. 430-437, (2011)

[2]

Powers S.K., Kavazis A.N.L.S., Prolonged mechanical ventilation alters diaphragmatic structure and function, Crit Care Med, 37, pp. S347-S353, (2009)

[3]

Levine S., Nguyen T., Taylor N., Friscia M.E., Budak M.T., Rothenberg P., Zhu J., Sachdeva R., Sonnad S., Kaiser L.R., Rubinstein N.A., Powers S.K.S.J., Rapid disuse atrophy of diaphragm fibers in mechanically ventilated humans, N Engl J Med, 358, 13, pp. 1327-1335, (2008)

[4]

Beduneau G., Pham T., Schortgen F., Piquilloud L., Zogheib E., Jonas M., Grelon F., Runge I., Terzi N., Grange S., Barberet G., Guitard P.G., Frat J.P., Constan A., Chretien J.M., Mancebo J., Mer B.L., Epidemiology of weaning outcome according to a new definition. The WIND study, Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 195, 6, pp. 772-783, (2016)

[5]

Funk G.C., Anders S., Breyer M.K., Burghuber O.C., Edelmann G., Heindl W., Et al., Incidence and outcome of weaning from mechanical ventilation according to new categories, Eur Respir J, 35, 1, pp. 88-94, (2010)

[6]

Savi A., Teixeira C., Silva J.M., Borges L.G., Pereira P.A., Pinto K.B., Et al., Weaning predictors do not predict extubation failure in simple-to-wean patients, J Crit Care, 27, 2, pp. 221-228, (2012)

[7]

Bouhemad B., Liu Z.H., Arbelot C., Zhang M., Ferarri F., Le-Guen M., Girard M., Lu Q.R.J., Ultrasound assessment of antibiotic-induced pulmonary reaeration in ventilator-associated pneumonia, Crit Care Med, 38, 1, pp. 84-92, (2010)

[8]

Soummer A., Perbet S., Brisson H., Arbelot C., Constantin J.-M., Lu Q., Et al., Ultrasound assessment of lung aeration loss during a successful weaning trial predicts postextubation distress, Crit Care Med, 40, 7, pp. 2064-2072, (2012)

[9]

Binet C., Neron L., Rochart N., Cousson J., Floch T., Charbit B., Et al., Validation d’un indice échographique prédictif d’échec de sevrage de la ventilation mécanique, Ann Fr Anesth Reanim, 33, (2014)

[10]

Shoaeir M., Noeam K.M.A., Lung aeration loss as a predictor of reintubation using lung ultrasound in mechanically ventilated patients, Biolife, 4, 3, pp. 514-520, (2016)

← 1 2 3 4 →