Male-male competition is not costly to dominant males in a cooperatively breeding bird

被引:0
作者
Martha J. Nelson-Flower
Amanda R. Ridley
机构
[1] University of Cape Town,Percy FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, DST NRF Centre of Excellence
[2] University of British Columbia,Department of Forest and Conservation Sciences
[3] University of Western Australia,Centre of Evolutionary Biology, School of Animal Biology
来源
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology | 2015年 / 69卷
关键词
Reproductive skew; Male-male competition; Cooperative breeding; Reproductive competition; Southern pied babbler;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Male-male reproductive competition occurs in many animal societies and can be costly, both through aggression or energy expenditure prior to mating and lost paternity. In most cooperative breeders, socially dominant males breed more often than do subordinates, but the costs of pre-copulatory subordinate male reproductive competition (including unsuccessful competition) have rarely been investigated in these systems. Here, we examine the association between such competition and the fitness of dominant males in the cooperatively breeding southern pied babbler (Turdoides bicolor). Babbler groups comprise a dominant breeding pair with adult subordinates of both sexes. Roughly 35 % of adult subordinate males live in groups with unrelated adult females, but despite their common engagement in active reproductive competition, these subordinate males rarely successfully breed (extra-group mating has never been detected). Overall, active reproductive competition with subordinate males is not costly to dominant males, notwithstanding that rare episodes of breeding by subordinate males cause large paternity losses (50–100 %). Specifically, the presence of an actively competing subordinate male does not affect the proportion of successful nests, the number of fledglings fathered by the dominant male or dominant male retention of dominance to the next breeding season. Instead, dominant male breeding success is likely to be more affected by factors such as food availability and group size. In the social context of cooperative breeding, a competing subordinate male may provide benefits of a larger group size or increased help; these may offset the low risk of paternity loss, possibly promoting tolerance of reproductive competitors by dominant males.
引用
收藏
页码:1997 / 2004
页数:7
相关论文
共 192 条
  • [1] Bolker BM(2009)Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution Trends Ecol Evol 24 127-135
  • [2] Brooks ME(1988)Worker reproduction in the higher eusocial Hymenoptera Q Rev Biol 63 291-311
  • [3] Clark CJ(1990)Promiscuity: an inbreeding avoidance mechanism in a socially monogamous species? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 26 191-199
  • [4] Geange SW(2010)Reproductive control via eviction (but not the threat of eviction) in banded mongooses Proc R Soc Lond B 277 2219-2226
  • [5] Poulsen JR(1979)The logical stag: adaptive aspects of fighting in red deer ( Anim Behav 27 211-225
  • [6] Stevens MHH(1998).) Proc R Soc Lond B 265 2291-2295
  • [7] White J-SS(1998)Infanticide and expulsion of females in a cooperative mammal Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29 141-177
  • [8] Bourke AFG(2000)Evolution of helping behavior in cooperatively breeding birds Proc R Soc Lond B 267 801-806
  • [9] Brooker MG(1986)Inbreeding avoidance and reproductive skew in a cooperative mammal J Anim Ecol 55 123-138
  • [10] Rowley I(2014)Reproductive success of dunnocks, Anim Behav 88 67-78