Emissions intensity comparisons and consumption-based CO2 accounting of transportation services

被引:0
作者
Pei-Chun Lin
Her-Jen Bai
机构
[1] National Cheng Kung University,Department of Transportation & Communications Management Science
[2] THI Consultants,undefined
[3] Inc.,undefined
来源
Maritime Economics & Logistics | 2024年 / 26卷
关键词
Carbon emissions; Input–output model (IO model); Global value chains (GVCs); Consumption-based accounting (CBA); Production-based accounting (PBA);
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
As the international division of labour becomes more entrenched, the distance goods travel before they reach the final consumer increases; at least this was the case before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. International trade and cross-border cargo movements generate significant carbon emissions. Despite theoretical advances, empirical studies frequently draw contradictory conclusions and the influence of international trade on a country’s decarbonization efforts is inconclusive. This study examines the carbon emissions caused by countries’ transportation services on global value chains. The input–output (IO) model and the 2015 multi-regional environmental input–output table from the UNCTAD-Eora database are employed. The input–output approach was used to determine the carbon emissions generated by the transport sector, along global value chains, in 190 countries. Environmentally extended IO analysis then reallocates emissions responsibilities of the transport sector from production to consumption. The study identifies which country’s transport sectors add more value or emit more CO2. Our findings indicated that: (1) the transportation industry of a country may have a detrimental effect on the environment while generating minimal economic benefit; and (2) a country’s transport industry may be tightly related to global value chain operations, but does not create considerable environmental impact. Given the significant differences in emissions intensity, we propose not only calculating the production-based accounting (PBA) of CO2 emissions, but also the consumption-based accounting (CBA). If CBA emissions are lower than PBA emissions, a country’s transport sector is in carbon-leakage credit. The top three countries with the highest carbon-leakage credit for the transport sector were China, Russia and USA. If carbon emissions are taken into consideration, some nations may cease to possess a comparative advantage in manufacturing and trade.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 150
页数:19
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Abraham KG(1996)Firms’ use of outside contractors: Theory and evidence Journal of Labor Economics 14 394-424
[2]  
Taylor SK(2005)Climate change policy, market structure, and carbon leakage Journal of International Economics 65 421-445
[3]  
Babiker MH(2010)CO2 emissions of international freight transport and offshoring: Measurement and allocation Ecological Economics 69 1682-1694
[4]  
Cadarso M-Á(2019)Improving the analysis of global value chains: The UNCTAD-Eora Database Transnational Corporations 26 115-142
[5]  
López L-A(2021)The sustainability of regional decarbonization through the global value chain analytical framework: A case study of Germany Journal of Cleaner Production 317 128335-173
[6]  
Gómez N(2013)Trade and the greenhouse gas emissions from international freight transport Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 65 153-40
[7]  
Tobarra M-Á(2019)Trade openness and carbon leakage: Empirical evidence from China’s industrial sector Energies 12 1101-51
[8]  
Casella B(2018)Consumption-based versus production-based accounting of CO Environmental Science & Policy 84 34-26
[9]  
Bolwijn R(2017) emissions: Is there evidence for carbon leakage? Maritime Economics & Logistics 19 1-49
[10]  
Moran D(1993)Globalization, public sector reform, and the role of ports in international supply chains American Economic Review 83 23-19