Why and How Does the EU Rule Global Digital Policy: an Empirical Analysis of EU Regulatory Influence in Data Protection Laws

被引:1
作者
Giulio Vittorio Cervi
机构
[1] London School of Economics and Political Science,
[2] Bocconi University,undefined
[3] FTI Consulting,undefined
来源
Digital Society | 2022年 / 1卷 / 2期
关键词
Regulatory influence; Brussels effect; Digital policy; Data protection; GDPR;
D O I
10.1007/s44206-022-00005-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Why is the EU capable of regulating the digital environment and how is it able to exert regulatory influence outside its boundaries? This article aims to answer the question by focusing on data protection laws and analysing empirical evidence gathered through interviews with government officials, data protection enforcers, experts, and activists from third countries, as well as industry stakeholders, EU policymakers, national regulators, and academics. Starting from the so-called Brussels effect to provide a comprehensive theoretical framework of EU regulatory influence, it is possible to disentangle the structural pressures that enable EU regulatory influence in foreign jurisdictions and the mechanisms through which it works. As European policymakers appear increasingly keen on setting global standards in new areas of the digital domain, this article provides insight into why and how the EU has been able to exert global influence via its General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Empirical evidence collected in this study points to three main drivers of the GDPR’s global success: the EU’s internal market appeal, its credibility as a regulator and enforcer, and the timing of its regulatory actions in line with evolving policy needs. This has enabled the EU to exert regulatory influence in a unilateral and indirect way—via market forces or independent import by third states—as well as in a more direct way—via adequacy decisions. The role of Member States and multilateralism appears to be limited.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Bach D(2007)The European regulatory state and global public policy: Micro-institutions, macro-influence Journal of European Public Policy 14 827-846
[2]  
Newman AL(2010)Governing lipitor and lipstick: Capacity, sequencing, and power in international pharmaceutical and cosmetics regulation Review of International Political Economy 17 665-695
[3]  
Bach D(2014)The European Union as hardening agent: Soft law and the diffusion of global financial regulation Journal of European Public Policy 21 430-452
[4]  
Newman AL(2021)The ‘Strasbourg effect’ on data protection in light of the ‘Brussels Effect’: Logic, mechanics and prospects Computer Law & Security Review 21 961-979
[5]  
Bach D(2014)Speaking with a single voice: Internal cohesiveness and external effectiveness of the EU in global governance Journal of European Public Policy 19 682-699
[6]  
Newman AL(2012)Market power Europe Journal of European Public Policy 9 353-374
[7]  
Bygrave LA(2006)Regulating information flows: States, private actors, and e-commerce Annual Review of Political Science 2 68-92
[8]  
da Conceição-Heldt E(2012)The Influence of European data privacy standards outside Europe: Implications for globalisation of convention 108 International Data Privacy Law 21 885-903
[9]  
Meunier S(2014)The power of functionalist extension: How EU rules travel Journal of European Public Policy 17 77-101
[10]  
Damro C(1994)The rise of the regulatory state in Europe West European Politics 13 907-908