A guide for pre-procedural imaging for transcatheter aortic valve replacement patients

被引:0
作者
Tjörvi E. Perry
Stephen A. George
Belinda Lee
Joyce Wahr
Darrell Randle
Garðar Sigurðsson
机构
[1] University of Minnesota,Department of Anesthesia, Division of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia
[2] Regions Hospital Heart Center,Department of Cardiology
[3] University of Minnesota,Department of Anesthesia, Preoperative Assessment Center
[4] University of Minnesota,Department of Cardiology
来源
Perioperative Medicine | / 9卷
关键词
TAVR; Imaging; Preoperative assessment; Echocardiography;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Safe and accurate pre-procedural assessment of cardiovascular anatomy, physiology, and pathophysiology prior to TAVR procedures can mean the difference between success and catastrophic failure. It is imperative that clinical care team members share a basic understanding of the preprocedural imaging technologies available for optimizing the care of TAVR patients. Herein, we review current imaging technology for assessing the anatomy, physiology, and pathophysiology of the aortic valvular complex, ventricular function, and peripheral vasculature, including echocardiography, cardiac catheterization, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance prior to a TAVR procedure. The authorship includes cardiac-trained anesthesiologists, anesthesiologists with expertise in pre-procedural cardiac assessment and optimization, and interventional cardiologists with expertise in cardiovascular imaging prior to TAVRs. Improving the understanding of all team members will undoubtedly translate into safer, more coordinated patient care.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 198 条
[1]  
Achenbach S(2012)SCCT expert consensus document on computed tomography imaging before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)/transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 6 366-380
[2]  
Delgado V(1990)Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography J Am Coll Cardiol 15 827-832
[3]  
Hausleiter J(2016)Prediction of poor outcome after transcatheter aortic valve replacement J Am Coll Cardiol 68 1868-1877
[4]  
Agatston AS(2009)Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice J Am Soc Echocardiogr 22 1-23
[5]  
Janowitz WR(2013)Interplay between mitral regurgitation and transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the CoreValve Revalving System: a multicenter registry Circulation 128 2145-2153
[6]  
Hildner FJ(2012)Aortic annulus dimension assessment by computed tomography for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: differences between systole and diastole Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 28 2091-2098
[7]  
Arnold SV(2015)Hybrid imaging during transcatheter structural heart interventions Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep 8 33-252
[8]  
Afilalo J(2012)Prediction of optimal deployment projection for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: angiographic 3-dimensional reconstruction of the aortic root versus multidetector computed tomography Circ Cardiovasc Interv 5 247-994
[9]  
Spertus JA(2012)Conformational pulsatile changes of the aortic annulus: impact on prosthesis sizing by computed tomography for transcatheter aortic valve replacement JACC Cardiovasc Interv 5 984-2243
[10]  
Baumgartner H(2003)Practical value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for clinical quantification of aortic valve stenosis: comparison with echocardiography Circulation 108 2236-716