Stakeholder Perceptions and Experiences Regarding Access to Contraception and Abortion for Transgender, Non-Binary, and Gender-Expansive Individuals Assigned Female at Birth in the U.S.

被引:0
作者
Laura Fix
Mary Durden
Juno Obedin-Maliver
Heidi Moseson
Jen Hastings
Ari Stoeffler
Sarah E. Baum
机构
[1] Ibis Reproductive Health,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
[2] Ibis Reproductive Health,Department of Family and Community Medicine
[3] Stanford University,undefined
[4] University of California,undefined
[5] San Francisco,undefined
[6] Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts,undefined
来源
Archives of Sexual Behavior | 2020年 / 49卷
关键词
Transgender; Abortion; Contraception; Family planning; Gender identity; Gender-inclusive;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Sexual and reproductive health (SRH) care often excludes the needs and experiences of transgender, non-binary, and gender-expansive (TGE) individuals. This study aimed to collect diverse stakeholder perspectives on barriers and facilitators to contraception and abortion for TGE individuals assigned female at birth (AFAB), assess knowledge and attitudes about unintended pregnancy prevention in these populations, and identify recommendations for improving SRH services for people of all genders. Between October 2017 and January 2018, we conducted 27 in-depth interviews with SRH stakeholders, including five TGE individuals who had obtained contraception or abortion care, and 22 clinicians, researchers, and advocates experienced in transgender healthcare. We iteratively developed a codebook and conducted thematic analysis to capture the spectrum of perspectives across interviews. Stakeholders reported a range of barriers to contraception and abortion access for TGE people AFAB, including inability to afford services, lack of gender-affirming clinicians, difficulty obtaining insurance coverage, and misconceptions about fertility and unplanned pregnancy risk. Deterrents to care-seeking included gendered healthcare environments, misgendering, and discrimination. Stakeholders described provider knowledge gaps and a perceived lack of medical education relevant to the SRH needs of TGE people. Recommendations included using gender-inclusive language and gender-affirming patient education materials and improving provider training on gender-affirming SRH care. Stakeholders identified substantial barriers to high-quality contraception and abortion care for TGE AFAB people in the U.S. They recommended specific interventions at the provider and institutional levels to improve experiences with care for TGE people and ensure broader access to gender-affirming SRH services.
引用
收藏
页码:2683 / 2702
页数:19
相关论文
共 156 条
[31]  
Crouch J(2017)Self-reported discrimination in health-care settings based on recognizability as transgender: A cross-sectional study among transgender U.S. citizens Archives of Sexual Behavior 47 973-393
[32]  
Wang A(2017)Transgender noninclusive healthcare and delaying care because of fear: Connections to general health and mental health among transgender adults Transgender Health 2 17-263
[33]  
Moreno MA(2012)Integrating lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) content into undergraduate medical school curricula: A qualitative study The Ochsner Journal 12 379-357
[34]  
Ahrens K(2018)Gender identity disparities in cancer screening behaviors American Journal of Preventive Medicine 54 385-undefined
[35]  
Breland DJ(2015)Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender patient care: Medical students’ preparedness and comfort Teaching and Learning in Medicine 27 254-undefined
[36]  
Harb CY(2018)Reproductive health care priorities and barriers to effective care for LGBTQ people assigned female at birth: A qualitative study Women’s Health Issues 28 350-undefined
[37]  
Pass LE(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[38]  
De Soriano IC(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[39]  
Zwick A(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[40]  
Gilbert PA(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined