Improving bone health: addressing the burden through an integrated approach

被引:0
作者
Mary E. Bussell
机构
[1] The Economist Intelligence Unit,
来源
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research | 2021年 / 33卷
关键词
Ageing; Bone health; Osteoporosis; Fractures; Multidisciplinary care; Integrated care pathways;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
As people age, maintaining mobility becomes increasingly imperative, therefore addressing bone health is the most important way to preserve mobility. Poor bone health encompasses a broad spectrum of diseases, but it is most often quantified as the cumulative burden of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. Rates of these fractures have been increasing and are expected to continue rising globally, attributed to increasing life expectancy worldwide. No single strategy will be sufficient to address this global public health issue. Co-ordination across a wide array of stakeholders is vital to decrease the health and socioeconomic burden of poor bone health. Stakeholders include an assortment of specialists ranging from health professionals (primary and secondary care clinicians, nurses, physical therapists, and social care workers), policy-makers, government bodies (including departments of health and social services), employers, civil society, as well as patients and their caregivers.  We need to ensure that there is a better understanding of the socioeconomic and health consequences of poor bone health to promote better policies to address needs. Building a more resilient health system approach to bone health based on the evidence and sound decision-making will not only improve population health, but will provide cost savings to health systems by preventing poor bone health in the first place. Health systems around the world must prioritise bone health to preserve mobility and wellbeing in advance of the impending surge in demand from ageing populations. Poor bone health is not an inevitable part of ageing. Working across the lifespan, we can all benefit from improved bone health throughout our lives.
引用
收藏
页码:2777 / 2786
页数:9
相关论文
共 100 条
[21]  
Heijmans S(2009)The aftermath of hip fracture: discharge placement, functional status change, and mortality Am J Epidemiol 29 1747-1402
[22]  
Strom O(2020)Utilization and costs of formal and informal care, home adaptations, and physiotherapy among older patients with hip fracture Bone Joint Res 49 1398-520
[23]  
Borgstrom F(2018)Metasynthesis of patient attitudes toward bone densitometry J Gen Internal Med 17 510-68
[24]  
Kanis JA(2019)Pharmacological management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline J Clin Endocrinol Metab 5 65-1204
[25]  
Harvey NC(2017)Imminent fracture risk Osteoporos Int 31 1193-S9
[26]  
McCloskey EV(2018)Characteristics of recurrent fractures Osteoporos Int 48 S4-undefined
[27]  
Mitchell PJ(2021)Efficacy and efficiency of fracture liaison services to reduce the risk of recurrent osteoporotic fractures Aging Clin Exp Res 31 1909-undefined
[28]  
Li N(2017)CAPTURE THE FRACTURE: INTEGRATED CARE PREVENTS THE DECREASE IN INTRINSIC CAPACITY IN ELDERLY SUBJECTS Innov Aging 48 4-undefined
[29]  
Cornelissen D(2018)Orthogeriatric co-management—managing frailty as well as fragility Injury undefined undefined-undefined
[30]  
Silverman S(2019)Quality improvement initiatives in fragility fracture care and prevention Current Osteoporos Rep undefined undefined-undefined