Improving bone health: addressing the burden through an integrated approach

被引:0
作者
Mary E. Bussell
机构
[1] The Economist Intelligence Unit,
来源
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research | 2021年 / 33卷
关键词
Ageing; Bone health; Osteoporosis; Fractures; Multidisciplinary care; Integrated care pathways;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
As people age, maintaining mobility becomes increasingly imperative, therefore addressing bone health is the most important way to preserve mobility. Poor bone health encompasses a broad spectrum of diseases, but it is most often quantified as the cumulative burden of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. Rates of these fractures have been increasing and are expected to continue rising globally, attributed to increasing life expectancy worldwide. No single strategy will be sufficient to address this global public health issue. Co-ordination across a wide array of stakeholders is vital to decrease the health and socioeconomic burden of poor bone health. Stakeholders include an assortment of specialists ranging from health professionals (primary and secondary care clinicians, nurses, physical therapists, and social care workers), policy-makers, government bodies (including departments of health and social services), employers, civil society, as well as patients and their caregivers.  We need to ensure that there is a better understanding of the socioeconomic and health consequences of poor bone health to promote better policies to address needs. Building a more resilient health system approach to bone health based on the evidence and sound decision-making will not only improve population health, but will provide cost savings to health systems by preventing poor bone health in the first place. Health systems around the world must prioritise bone health to preserve mobility and wellbeing in advance of the impending surge in demand from ageing populations. Poor bone health is not an inevitable part of ageing. Working across the lifespan, we can all benefit from improved bone health throughout our lives.
引用
收藏
页码:2777 / 2786
页数:9
相关论文
共 100 条
[1]  
Kanis JA(2019)European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women Osteoporos Int 30 3-44
[2]  
Cooper C(2020)Fragility fractures in Europe: burden, management and opportunities Arch Osteoporos 15 59-310
[3]  
Rizzoli R(2017)Excess mortality after hip fracture in elderly persons from Europe and the USA: the CHANCES project J Intern Med 281 300-77
[4]  
Borgström F(2015)Fragility non-hip fracture patients are at risk Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135 69-2578
[5]  
Karlsson L(2015)Effective secondary fracture prevention: implementation of a global benchmarking of clinical quality using the IOF Capture the Fracture R Best Practice Framework tool Osteoporos Int 26 2573-259
[6]  
Ortsäter G(2019)Osteoporosis The Lancet 32 251-155
[7]  
Katsoulis M(2021)The osteoporosis treatment gap in patients at risk of fracture in European primary care: a multi-country cross-sectional observational study Osteoporos Int 6 59-1529
[8]  
Benetou V(2011)Osteoporosis: burden, health care provision and opportunities in the EU: a report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA) Arch Osteoporos 28 1507-13
[9]  
Karapetyan T(2017)Mind the (treatment) gap: a global perspective on current and future strategies for prevention of fragility fractures Osteoporos Int 1 1-773
[10]  
Gosch M(2020)An updated systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses of drugs for osteoporosis Pharmacoeconomics 33 759-1452