Does trading votes in national elections change election outcomes?

被引:0
作者
Frank Daumann
Alfred Wassermann
机构
[1] Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena,School of Social and Behavioral Sciences
[2] University of Bayreuth,Mathematical Department
来源
Public Choice | 2009年 / 139卷
关键词
Voting; Market for votes; Personal tax; Personal subsidies; D40; D72; H24;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Although forbidden in democratic states a market for votes could improve efficiency. This paper examines the way trading votes will change the outcome of an election. A two-party model with two phases is presented. In the pre-trading phase the two parties set their agendas consisting of a direct subsidy and an income tax. In the trading phase voters buy and sell votes. On the basis of rational voter behavior and a given income distribution, it is shown that the outcome of the election depends mainly on how the selling voters are distributed among the voters.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 441
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Barro R. J.(1973)The control of politicians: an economic model Public Choice 14 19-42
[2]  
Blair D. H.(1989)Unbundling the voting rights and profit claims of common shares Journal of Political Economy 97 420-443
[3]  
Golbe D. L.(1986)Vote buying in a stylized setting Public Choice 49 3-15
[4]  
Gerard J. M.(1960)The problem of social cost The Journal of Law and Economics 3 1-44
[5]  
Buchanan J. M.(1966)The possibility of a social welfare function American Economic Review 56 1105-1122
[6]  
Lee D. R.(1985)Why restrain alienation? Columbia Law Review 85 970-990
[7]  
Coase R. H.(2004)Rational choice theory and the paradox of not voting Journal of Economic Perspectives 18 99-112
[8]  
Coleman J. S.(1999)The probability of being decisive Public Choice 101 267-283
[9]  
Epstein R. A.(1980)Takeover bids, the free-rider problem, and the theory of the corporation Bell Journal of Economics 9 42-64
[10]  
Feddersen T. J.(1997)Do people care about democracy? An experiment exploring the value of voting rights Public Choice 91 24-27