Making for science: a framework for the design of physical materials for science learning

被引:0
作者
Cassia Fernandez
Tatiana Hochgreb-Haegele
Adelmo Eloy
Paulo Blikstein
机构
[1] Columbia University,Transformative Learning Technologies Lab, Teachers College
[2] Stanford University,Graduate School of Education
来源
Educational technology research and development | 2024年 / 72卷
关键词
Science education; Maker education; Hands-on learning; Epistemic agency;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Recent work in science education has emphasized the importance of the conceptual, social, and epistemic dimensions in science learning. But what about the material dimension—the actual physical materials that students use? The way their characteristics and affordances limit or determine instruction has thus far not been as thoroughly explored. Despite the vast body of work that exists on science and engineering practices, there are relatively few examples of how physical science materials are linked to and can support engagement with such practices for sensemaking. In this paper, we propose a framework for analyzing the design of these physical materials and the activities associated with them that can serve as lenses for educators and researchers to consider when planning and reflecting on classroom instruction. To validate our framework, we apply it to analyze activities developed and implemented by teachers during a four-year research-practice partnership project conducted in a city in Brazil, and investigate potential connections between the design of physical materials and students’ epistemic agency. We conclude with recommendations for the development of physical resources in labs and makerspaces for science learning.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 82
页数:23
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
Benedict-Chambers A(2017)Guiding students towards sensemaking: Teacher questions focused on integrating scientific practices with science content International Journal of Science Education 39 1977-2001
[2]  
Kademian SM(2019)Working with and Shifting the System: A response to Elby’s commentary Journal of Research in Science Teaching 56 521-525
[3]  
Davis EA(2017)The promise and the promises of making in science education Studies in Science Education 53 75-103
[4]  
Palincsar AS(2015)Computationally enhanced toolkits for children: Historical review and a framework for future design Foundations and Trends® in–Human Computer Interaction 9 1-68
[5]  
Berland L(2019)Scientific sensemaking supports science content learning across disciplines and instructional contexts Contemporary Educational Psychology 59 175-218
[6]  
Manz E(2002)Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks Science Education 86 1015-1033
[7]  
Miller E(2021)The effects of different kinds of hands-on modeling activities on the academic achievement, problem-solving skills, and scientific creativity of prospective science teachers Research in Science Education 51 268-291
[8]  
Stroupe D(2008)Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals Review of Research in Education 32 511-537
[9]  
Bevan B(2020)STEM in the making? Investigating STEM learning in junior school makerspaces Research in Science Education 52 241-255
[10]  
Blikstein P(2023)Beyond “having fun” as evidence of learning: A longitudinal case study of a teacher’s evolving conception of hands-on science activities Journal of Science Education and Technology 32 1041-1048