Gender differences in confidence during number-line estimation

被引:0
作者
Michelle L. Rivers
Charles J. Fitzsimmons
Susan R. Fisk
John Dunlosky
Clarissa A. Thompson
机构
[1] Kent State University,Department of Psychological Sciences
[2] Kent State University,Department of Sociology
来源
Metacognition and Learning | 2021年 / 16卷
关键词
Confidence judgments; Estimation; Gender differences; Number lines;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Prior research has found gender differences in spatial tasks in which men perform better, and are more confident, than women. Do gender differences also occur in people’s confidence as they perform number-line estimation, a common spatial-numeric task predictive of math achievement? To investigate this question, we analyzed outcomes from six studies (N = 758 girls/women and boys/men with over 20,000 observations; grades 1–5 and adults) that involved a similar method: Participants estimated where a provided number (e.g., ¾, 37) was located on a bounded number line (e.g., 0–1; 0–100), then judged their confidence in that estimate. Boys/men were more precise (g = .52) and more confident (g = .30) in their estimates than were girls/women. Linear mixed model analyses of the trial-level data revealed that girls’/women’s estimates had about 31% more error than did boys’/men’s estimates, and even when controlling for precision, girls/women were about 7% less confident in their estimates than were boys/men. These outcomes should encourage researchers to consider gender differences for studies on math cognition and provide pathways for future research to address potential mechanisms underlying the present gender gaps.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 178
页数:21
相关论文
共 222 条
  • [1] Ariel R(2012)Guidelines for psychological practice with lesbian, gay, and bisexual clients American Psychologist 67 10-42
  • [2] Lembeck NA(2018)Are there sex differences in confidence and metacognitive monitoring accuracy for everyday, academic, and psychometrically measured spatial ability? Intelligence 70 42-51
  • [3] Moffat S(2019)Certainty in numerical judgments develops independently of the approximate number system Cognitive Development 52 100817-785
  • [4] Hertzog C(2014)Early predictors of middle school fraction knowledge Developmental Science 17 775-215
  • [5] Baer C(1977)Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change Psychological Review 84 191-68
  • [6] Odic D(1998)The mismeasure of memory: When retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 127 55-382
  • [7] Bailey DH(2010)Using multiple calibration indices in order to capture the complex picture of what affects students’ accuracy of feeling of confidence Learning and Instruction 20 372-201
  • [8] Siegler RS(2006)Developmental and individual differences in pure numerical estimation Developmental Psychology 42 189-1031
  • [9] Geary DC(2008)Numerical magnitude representations influence arithmetic learning Child Development 79 1016-111
  • [10] Bandura A(2010)A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis Research Synthesis Methods 1 97-192