Complication rates and outcomes stratified by treatment modalities in proximal humeral fractures: A systematic literature review from 1970-2009

被引:31
作者
Tepass A. [1 ]
Rolauffs B. [1 ]
Weise K. [1 ]
Bahrs S.D. [3 ]
Dietz K. [2 ]
Bahrs C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Eberhard-Karls University, Tübingen
[2] Department of Medical Biometry, Eberhard-Karls University, Tübingen
[3] Department of Radiology, Eberhard-Karls University, Tübingen
关键词
Complication; Proximal humeral fracture; Shoulder fractures; Systematic review; Treatment;
D O I
10.1186/1754-9493-7-34
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The optimal treatment of complex, displaced proximal humeral fractures is controversial. A systematic literature review of the time period from 1970 to 2009 was conducted. The purpose was to evaluate the clinical success and complications of the available treatment modalities to determine specific treatment recommendations for the different fracture patterns.Methods: The databases (PubMed/EMBASE) were searched for the time period (01/1970-09/2009). Study quality, treatment modalities, classification, outcome scores and complications of 200 publications including 9377 patients were analyzed. Interventions were compared by analysis of variance with subsequent Tukey's-test. Complication rates among methods were compared by using Pearson's-chi-square-test and pairwise comparisons using Fisher's-two-tailed-exact-test.Results: Hemiarthroplasty, angle-stable plate and non-operative treatment were used for 63% of the follow-up-patients. For 3- and 4-part fractures, patients with hemiarthroplasty [3-Part: 56.4 (lower/upper 95% confidence interval (CI): 43.3-68.7); 4-Part: 49.4 (CI: 42.2-56.7)] received a lower score than different surgical head-preserving methods such as ORIF [3-Part: 82.4 (CI: 76.6-86.9); 4-Part: 83.0 (CI:78.7-86.6)], intramedullary nailing [3-Part: 79.1 (CI:74.0-83.4)] or angle-stable plates [4-Part: 66.4 (CI: 59.7-72.4)].The overall complication rate was 56%. The most common complications were fracture-displacement, malunion, humeral head necrosis and malreduction. The highest complication rates were documented for conventional plate and hemiarthroplasty and for AO-C, AO-A, for 3- and 4-part fractures. Only 25% of the data were reported with detailed classification results and the corresponding outcome scores.Discussion: Despite the large amount of patients included, it is difficult to determine adequate recommendations for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures because a relevant lack of follow-up data impaired subsequent analysis. For displaced 3- and 4-part fractures head-preserving therapy received better outcome scores than hemiarthroplasty. However, a higher number of complications occurred in more complex fractures and when hemiarthroplasty or conventional plate osteosynthesis was performed. Thus, when informing the patient for consent, both the clinical results and the possibly expected complications with a chosen treatment modality should be addressed. © 2013 Tepass et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 101 条
[1]  
Lind, T., Kroner, K., Jensen, J., The epidemiology of fractures of the proximal humerus (1989) Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 108, pp. 285-287. , 10.1007/BF00932316, 2789504
[2]  
Rose, S.H., Melton, L.J., Morrey, B.F., Ilstrup, D.M., Riggs, B.L., Epidemiologic features of humeral fractures (1982) Clin Orthop Relat Res, 168, pp. 24-30
[3]  
Court-Brown, C.M., Caesar, B., Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review (2006) Injury, 37, pp. 691-697. , 10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.130, 16814787
[4]  
Palvanen, M., Kannus, P., Niemi, S., Parkkari, J., Update in the epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures (2006) Clin Orthop Relat Res, 442, pp. 87-92. , 10.1097/01.blo.0000194672.79634.78, 16394745
[5]  
Sakuma, M., Endo, N., Oinuma, T., Endo, E., Yazawa, T., Watanabe, K., Watanabe, S., Incidence and outcome of osteoporotic fractures in 2004 in Sado City, Niigata Prefecture, Japan (2008) J Bone Miner Metab, 26, pp. 373-378. , 10.1007/s00774-007-0841-1, 18600404
[6]  
Court-Brown, C.M., Garg, A., McQueen, M.M., The epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures (2001) Acta Orthop Scand, 72, pp. 365-371. , 10.1080/000164701753542023, 11580125
[7]  
Tepass, A., Blumenstock, G., Weise, K., Rolauffs, B., Bahrs, C., Current strategies for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures: an analysis of a survey carried out at 348 hospitals in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland (2013) J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 22, pp. e8-e14
[8]  
Neer, C.S., Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation (1970) J Bone Joint Surg Am, 52, pp. 1077-1089
[9]  
Marsh, J.L., Slongo, T.F., Agel, J., Broderick, J.S., Creevey, W., DeCoster, T.A., Prokuski, L., Audige, L., Fracture and dislocation classification compendium - 2007: orthopaedic trauma association classification, database and outcomes committee (2007) J Orthop Trauma, 21, pp. S1-S133. , 10.1097/00005131-200711101-00001, 18277234
[10]  
Neer, C.S., Displaced proximal humeral fractures. II. Treatment of three-part and four-part displacement (1970) J Bone Joint Surg Am, 52, pp. 1090-1103