Contemporary management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

被引:0
作者
Ajay Yadlapati
Mark Gajjar
Daniel R. Schimmel
Mark J. Ricciardi
James D. Flaherty
机构
[1] Northwestern University,Division of Cardiology, Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Feinberg School of Medicine
来源
Internal and Emergency Medicine | 2016年 / 11卷
关键词
STEMI; Perfusion; Guidelines; Evolution;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), which constitutes nearly 25–40 % of current acute myocardial infarction (AMI) cases, is a medical emergency that requires prompt recognition and treatment. Since the 2013 STEMI practice guidelines, a wealth of additional data that may further advance optimal STEMI practices has emerged. These data highlight the importance of improving patient treatment and transport algorithms for STEMI from non-primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) centers. In addition, a focus on the reduction of total pain-to-balloon (P2B) times rather than simply door-to-balloon (D2B) times may further improve outcomes after primary PCI for STEMI. The early administration of newer oral P2Y12 inhibitors, including crushed forms of these agents for faster absorption, represents another treatment advancement. Recent data also suggest avoiding concurrent morphine use due to interactions with P2Y12 inhibitors. Furthermore, new technological advancements and investigational therapies, including Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds and the use of pre-intervention intravenous microbubbles with transthoracic ultrasound, hold promise to play a useful role in future STEMI care. Despite these advancements, the prompt recognition of STEMI, at both the patient and health care system level, remains the cornerstone of optimal treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:1107 / 1113
页数:6
相关论文
共 280 条
[1]  
Steg PG(2012)ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation Eur Heart J 33 2569-2619
[2]  
James SK(2012)National Registry of Myocardial Infarction I. Association of bleeding and in-hospital mortality in black and white patients with st-segment-elevation myocardial infarction receiving reperfusion Circulation 125 1727-1734
[3]  
Atar D(2006)Effect of door-to-balloon time on mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction J Am Coll Cardiol 47 2180-2186
[4]  
Badano LP(2004)Time delay to treatment and mortality in primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: every minute of delay counts Circulation 109 1223-1225
[5]  
Blomstrom-Lundqvist C(1999)Relationship between delay in performing direct coronary angioplasty and early clinical outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from the global use of strategies to open occluded arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes (GUSTO-IIb) trial Circulation 100 14-20
[6]  
Mehta RH(2013)Door-to-balloon time and mortality among patients undergoing primary PCI N Engl J Med 369 901-909
[7]  
Parsons L(2010)Trends in door-to-balloon time and mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention Arch Intern Med 170 1842-1849
[8]  
Rao SV(2014)Minimizing door-to-balloon time is not the most critical factor in improving clinical outcome of ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention Crit Care Med 42 1788-1796
[9]  
Peterson ED(2015)Relation between door-to-balloon times and mortality after primary percutaneous coronary intervention over time: a retrospective study Lancet 385 1114-1122
[10]  
McNamara RL(2010)Effect of onset-to-door time and door-to-balloon time on mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions for st-segment elevation myocardial infarction Am J Cardiol 106 143-147