Gender and the Choice of a Science Career: The Impact of Social Support and Possible Selves

被引:0
作者
Sarah K. Buday
Jayne E. Stake
Zoë D. Peterson
机构
[1] University of Missouri-St. Louis,Department of Psychology
来源
Sex Roles | 2012年 / 66卷
关键词
Science careers; Sex differences; Gender; Social support; Possible selves; Self-confidence;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study examined the relationships among perceived social support, beliefs about how one would fare in a science career, and perceptions and choice of a career in science. Participants were 48 men and 33 women from the Midwestern United States who had been identified as gifted in mathematics and science and participated in a high school science enrichment program. They ranged in age from 24 to 28 years old, and the sample was predominantly White (83.3%). Participants completed an online measure approximately 10 years after the program ended examining their sources of support and beliefs about the self as a scientist to see how these variables influence perceptions of a science career and actual career. We expected that the relationship between perceived support from people and current job held would be mediated by participants’ beliefs about their personal life as a scientist in the future. Similarly, we expected that the relationship between a perceived supportive environment and having a science career would be mediated by participants’ beliefs about their career as a scientist in the future. Findings indicated that social support contributed directly to men’s and women’s ability to envision themselves in a future science career, which, in turn, predicted their interest in and motivation for a science career. No significant gender differences were found in the predictors of men’s and women’s perceptions and choice of a science career. Implications for recruitment of students into scientific majors and careers are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 209
页数:12
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
Baron R. M.(1986)The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 1173-1182
[2]  
Kenny D. A.(1997)A longitudinal study of undergraduate women in engineering and science. Frontiers in Education Conference. 1997. 27th Annual Conference. ‘Teaching and Learning in an Era of Change’ Proceedings 1 134-143
[3]  
Brainard SG(1991)The roots of gender inequity in technical areas Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28 251-264
[4]  
Carlin L(2010)Explaining underrepresentation: A theory of precluded interest Sex Roles 63 475-488
[5]  
Campbell JR(2005)Studying gender and ethnic differences in participation in math, physical science, and information technology New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 2005 7-14
[6]  
Cheryan S(2009)Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses Behavior Research Methods 41 1149-1160
[7]  
Plaut VC(2006)Why don’t they want a male-dominated job? An investigation of young women who changed their occupational aspirations Educational Research and Evaluation 12 359-372
[8]  
Eccles JS(2008)How undergraduate engineering students perceive women’s (and men’s) problems in science, math and engineering Sex Roles 58 251-265
[9]  
Faul F(1993)Appendix 3 C: Gender fairness environment scale [developed by the University of Virginia School of Medicine Committee on Women]. Perceptions of the medical education environment Journal of the American Medical Women’s Association 48 51-54
[10]  
Erdfelder E(2004)The gender gap in possible selves: Divergence of academic self-views among high school and university students Sex Roles 50 357-371