Mathematics teachers' learning: A conceptual framework and synthesis of research

被引：96
作者：
Goldsmith L.T. [1 ]
Doerr H.M. [2 ]
Lewis C.C. [3 ]
机构：
[1] Education Development Center, Inc., Waltham, MA, 02463
[2] Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, 13244
[3] Mills College, Oakland, CA, 94613
来源：
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education | 2014年 / 17卷 / 1期
基金：
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词：
In-service teachers; Mathematics; Professional development; Teacher learning;
D O I：
10.1007/s10857-013-9245-4
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
How do practicing mathematics teachers continue to develop the knowledge and habits of mind that enable them to teach well and to improve their teaching over time? The question of how (and what) teachers learn lies at the crux of any effort to provide high-quality mathematics teaching for all students. This article reviews 106 articles written between 1985 and 2008 related to the professional learning of practicing teachers of mathematics. We offer a synthesis of this research, guided by Clarke and Hollingsworth's (Teach Teach Educ 18(8):947-967, 2002) dynamic model of teacher growth. Their model emphasizes the recursive nature of teachers' learning and suggests that growth in one aspect of teachers' knowledge and practice may promote subsequent growth in other areas. We report the results in six major areas of teacher learning, identify several crosscutting themes in the literature, and make recommendations for future research aimed at understanding teachers' professional learning. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
引用
收藏
页码：5 / 36
页数：31
相关论文
共 131 条
[21]  
Chazan D., Ben-Chaim D., Gormas J., Shared teaching assignments in the service of mathematics reform: Situated professional development, Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 7, pp. 687-702, (1998)
[22]  
Clarke D., Hollingsworth H., Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth, Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 8, pp. 947-967, (2002)
[23]  
Cohen D.K., A revolution in one classroom: The case of Mrs. Oublier, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 3, pp. 311-329, (1990)
[24]  
Cohen D.K., Hill H.C., Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California, Teachers College Record, 102, 2, pp. 294-343, (2000)
[25]  
Collopy R., Curriculum materials as a professional development tool: How a mathematics textbook affected two teachers' learning, The Elementary School Journal, 103, 3, pp. 287-311, (2003)
[26]  
(2010)
[27]  
Confrey J., Castro J., Wilhelm J., Implementation research as a means to link systemic reform and applied psychology in mathematics education, Educational Psychologist, 35, 3, pp. 179-191, (2000)
[28]  
Crockett M.D., Inquiry as professional development: Creating dilemmas through teachers' work, Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 5, pp. 609-624, (2002)
[29]  
Cwikla J., The trials of a poor middle school trying to catch up in mathematics teachers' multiple communities of practice and the boundary encounters, Education and Urban Society, 39, 4, pp. 554-583, (2007)
[30]  
Davis B., Simmt E., Understanding learning systems: Mathematics education and complexity science, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34, 2, pp. 137-167, (2003)
12345678910