Delay Discounting by College Undergraduates of Hypothetical Intervention Effects for Challenging Behavior

被引:0
作者
Mindy C. Scheithauer
Nathan A. Call
Christina A. Simmons
Scott E. Gillespie
Jason Bourret
Lindsay A. Lloveras
Jacquelyn E. Lanphear
机构
[1] Emory University School of Medicine,Marcus Autism Center
[2] University of Georgia,Munroe
[3] Rowan University,Meyer Institute
[4] The New England Center for Children,Department of Psychology
[5] University of Florida,undefined
来源
The Psychological Record | 2020年 / 70卷
关键词
Autism spectrum disorder; Challenging behavior; Problem behavior; Delay discounting;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
It is well-established that humans have a bias towards immediate, compared to delayed, rewards. Although this bias has been primarily studied using monetary or other consumable commodities, it has also been demonstrated with outcomes of caregiver-mediated behavioral interventions targeting challenging behavior, which is a prevalent concern among children with autism spectrum disorder. In particular, caregivers may discount improvements in their child’s challenging behavior following behavioral interventions when the onset of improvement is delayed (Call et al. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 45, 1013–1025, 2015). The present study includes a sample of college students reading hypothetical vignettes about children with challenging behavior to evaluate the impact of child characteristics and caregiver role (parent vs. teacher) on discounting and the relationship between discounting of treatment and monetary commodities. Results suggest a discounting pattern across all groups, with no significant differences in discounting based on characteristics of the child/caregiver and steeper discounting for monetary compared to treatment outcomes. The results have implications for future research on caregiver-mediated interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 73
页数:8
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Allen KD(2000)The problem of parental nonadherence in clinical behavior analysis: Effective treatment is not enough Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 33 373-391
[2]  
Warzak WJ(1999)Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: Delay discounting in current, never, and ex-smokers Psychopharmacology 146 447-454
[3]  
Bickel WK(2011)A review of behavioral interventions for the treatment of aggression in individuals with developmental disabilities Research in Developmental Disabilities 32 437-446
[4]  
Odum AL(2015)The impact of delays on parents’ perceptions of treatments for problem behavior Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders 45 1013-1025
[5]  
Madden GJ(1996)Temporal discounting and utility for health and money. Learning, Memory, & Cognition 22 771-791
[6]  
Brosnan J(2008)Commodity specific rates of temporal discounting: Does metabolic function underlie differences in rates of discounting? Behavioral Processes 77 334-342
[7]  
Healy O(2003)Delay discounting by pathological gamblers Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 36 449-458
[8]  
Call NA(2007)Discounting of monetary and directly consumable rewards Psychological Science 18 58-63
[9]  
Reavis AR(2004)A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards Psychological Bulletin 130 769-792
[10]  
McCracken CE(2016)Does a pre-intervention functional assessment increase intervention effectiveness? A meta-analysis of within-subject interrupted time-series studies Clinical Psychology Review 477 1-84