Fallow priority areas for spatial trade-offs between cost and efficiency in China

被引:0
作者
Siyan Zeng
Fu Chen
Gang-Jun Liu
Estelle Raveloaritiana
Thomas Cherico Wanger
机构
[1] Zhejiang University,College of Environmental and Resource Sciences
[2] Westlake University,Key Laboratory of Coastal Environment and Resources of Zhejiang Province, School of Engineering
[3] Westlake University,Sustainable Agricultural Systems & Engineering Lab, School of Engineering
[4] Hohai University,School of Public Administration
[5] RMIT University,Geospatial Science, School of Science, STEM College
[6] GlobalAgroforestryNetwork.org,undefined
[7] ChinaRiceNetwork.org,undefined
来源
Communications Earth & Environment | / 4卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Fallow pilot policies exist in China but fallow priority areas have yet to be identified based on eco-environmental stressors and spatial cost-benefit analyses. Here we use a multi-criteria optimization algorithm to determine fallow priority areas based on soil pollution, groundwater overexploitation, land quality, and ecological protection redlines delineation data and with high-cost effectiveness. By considering five spatial scenarios on three objective functions, we find most notably that fallowing the top 20% of priority areas, the benefit of pollution control and environmental protection can be achieved by up to 98.7% and 64.7%, respectively. Our results show that effective fallow prioritization on cultivated land may reduce implementation costs by up to 509.3 billion USD, corresponding to 13.6% of China’s budget in 2021. Thus, effective fallow prioritization will promote sustainable land use by pursuing goals between benefits and cost synergistically and allow budget allocation to other sustainable agricultural targets based on agricultural diversification.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]  
Tilman D(2002)Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices Nature 418 671-677
[2]  
Braun VJ(2010)Strategic body needed to beat food crises Nature 465 548-549
[3]  
Khan S(2021)Global soil pollution by toxic elements: current status and future perspectives on the risk assessment and remediation strategies—a review J. Hazard Mater. 417 126039-1152
[4]  
Tamburini G(2020)Agricultural diversification promotes multiple ecosystem services without compromising yield Sci. Adv. 6 45-999
[5]  
Wanger TC(2020)Integrating agroecological production in a robust post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4 1150-231
[6]  
Shi K(2019)Mapping and evaluating cultivated land fallow in Southwest China using multisource data Sci. Total Environ. 654 987-1003
[7]  
Yang Q(2017)A review and implication of land fallow system research J. Resour. Ecol. 8 223-949
[8]  
Li Y(2017)Mapping rice-fallow cropland areas for short-season grain legumes intensification in South Asia using MODIS 250 m time-series data Int. J. Digit. Earth 9 981-384
[9]  
Sun X(2018)Mapping cropland fallow areas in Myanmar to scale up sustainable intensification of pulse crops in the farming system Gisci. Remote Sens. 1 924-1186
[10]  
Wu Q(2006)Cultivated land conversion and potential agricultural productivity in China Land Use Policy 23 372-166