Could Selective Re-look Angiography Improve the Outcome of Cardiogenic Shock in Patients Under Veno-arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenator?

被引:0
作者
Maurice Maksoud
Amr S. Omar
Praveen Sivadasan
Tamer Abdalghafoor
Alaa Rahhal
Tasnim Abdalla
Bassam Shoman
Rula Taha
Abdulaziz AlKhulaifi
机构
[1] Heart Hospital,Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery/Cardiac Anaesthesia & ICU Section
[2] Hamad Medical Corporation,Department of Critical Care Medicine
[3] Beni Suef University,Department of Clinical Pharmacy
[4] Weill Cornell Medical College-Qatar,Faculty of Medicine
[5] Heart Hospital,undefined
[6] Hamad Medical Corporation,undefined
[7] Qatar University,undefined
来源
Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research | 2022年 / 15卷
关键词
Angiography; ECMO; Cardiogenic shock;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
It is not well studied whether a secondary look by angiography (Re-Ang) after fixing the culprit lesion would be beneficial or not in cardiogenic shock (CS) supported by veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (VA-ECMO). This study was a retrospective observational one that looked at 5-year data from a single tertiary center. Patients were grouped according to the need of Re-Ang during the VA-ECMO course into 2 groups. The indications to perform Re-Ang were loss of pulse pressure, drop in ejection fraction or velocity time integral, resistant arrhythmia, or new electrocardiographic changes suggestive of ischemia. Out of 150 patients with cardiogenic shock screened, 30 patients were enrolled in our study. Re-Ang was done in 10 patients only. In 80% of them, positive findings were found in terms of new significant stenosis (3 patients), stent restenosis (1 patient), stent thrombosis (3 patients), and patent stent(s) with intervention to the remaining lesions in other vessels (1 patient). Neither successful weaning from VA-ECMO nor mortality was statistically different between both groups. Our set indications for Re-Ang were effective in finding a possible new culprit for a conceivable coronary intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:268 / 278
页数:10
相关论文
共 146 条
[1]  
Hill JD(1972)Prolonged extracorporeal oxygenation for acute post-traumatic respiratory failure (shock-lung syndrome). Use of the Bramson membrane lung N Engl J Med. 286 629-34
[2]  
O'Brien TG(2015)Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use has increased by 433% in adults in the United States from 2006 to 2011 ASAIO Journal. 61 31-36
[3]  
Murray JJ(2010)Early extracorporeal membrane oxygenator-assisted primary percutaneous coronary intervention improved 30-day clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated with profound cardiogenic shock Critical care medicine. 38 1810-1817
[4]  
Dontigny L(2013)Using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation to rescue acute myocardial infarction with cardiopulmonary collapse: The impact of early coronary revascularization Resuscitation 84 940-945
[5]  
Bramson ML(2012)Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation–assisted primary percutaneous coronary intervention may improve survival of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by profound cardiogenic shock Journal of critical care. 27 530-e1
[6]  
Osborn JJ(2013)Primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction, resuscitated cardiac arrest, and cardiogenic shock: the role of primary multivessel revascularization JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 6 115-25
[7]  
Gerbode F(2017)PCI strategies in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock New England Journal of Medicine. 377 2419-32
[8]  
Sauer CM(2001)Comparison of impact of primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and primary stenting on short-term mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock and evaluation of prognostic determinants Am J Cardiol. 87 1184-8
[9]  
Yuh DD(2014)Rescue venoarterial ECMO in cardiogenic shock complicated by refractory cardiac arrest during percutaneous coronary intervention Cor et Vasa. 56 e348-53
[10]  
Bonde P(2020)Prophylactic veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention Neth Heart J. 28 139-144