A journey towards shared governance: status and prospects for collaborative management in the protected areas of Bangladesh

被引:0
作者
A. Z. M. Manzoor Rashid
Donna Craig
Sharif Ahmed Mukul
Niaz Ahmed Khan
机构
[1] University of Western Sydney,Environmental Law, School of Law
[2] Shahjalal University of Science and Technology,Department of Forestry and Environmental Science
[3] The University of Queensland,School of Agriculture and Food Sciences
[4] University of Dhaka,Department of Development Studies
来源
Journal of Forestry Research | 2013年 / 24卷
关键词
protected area; co-management; Nishorgo; IPAC; governance;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Establishment of Protected Areas (PAs), in the face of rapid deforestation, forest degradation and climate change has been one of the key efforts in conservation of biodiversity worldwide in recent times. While Bangladesh has gained a degree of prominence in the world for its successful social forestry programs, the concept of collaborative protected area management is rather new in the country, initiated in 2004 by the Bangladesh Forest Department in five PAs with financial assistance from USAID. Based on empirical evidence from three of the pilot PAs, we examined the achievements and associated challenges and prospects for co-management. Our fieldwork revealed a number of challenges faced by co-management institutions: (1) institutions were dominated by the elite group, overshadowing the voice of the community people; (2) mutual trust and collective performance are key to good governance but had not taken root in the PAs; (3) encroachment onto forest land and subsequent conversion to agriculture remained a serious problem that discouraged forest-dependent people from participating actively in co-management initiatives; (4) legal provisions (including acts, rules and policies) were not clearly and adequately disseminated and understood at the community level; (5) there remained a degree of ambiguity regarding the roles and responsibilities of forest department (FD) and co-management committees (CMC) in field operations, and this was not enhancing transparency and accountability of the overall initiative; (6) the long-term sustainability of co-management institutions was another major concern, as the local intuitional structure was still in a nascent stage, and provisioning of resources (either internally or externally) remained somewhat uncertain. We offer recommendations for improvement.
引用
收藏
页码:599 / 605
页数:6
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Appanah S(1992)The importance of forest biodiversity to developing countries in Asia Journal of Tropical Forest Science 5 201-215
[2]  
Ratnam L(2009)Community conserved areas: policy issues in historic and contemporary context Conservation Letters 2 20-25
[3]  
Berkes F(2002)Indigenous and local communities and protected areas: rethinking the relationship Parks 12 5-15
[4]  
Borrini-Feyerabend G(2003)Governance of protected areas-innovation in the air Policy Matters 12 92-101
[5]  
Borrini-Feyerabend G(2001)Indigenous people and co-management: implications for conflict management Environmental Science and Policy 4 229-239
[6]  
Castro AP(2002)Recognizing indigenous rights through co-management regimes: Canadian and Australian experiences New Zealand Journal of Environmental Law 6 199-254
[7]  
Nielsen E(2007)Land use change around protected areas: management to balance human needs and ecological function Ecological Application 17 1031-1038
[8]  
Craig D(2006)Rediscovering community conserved areas in south-east Asia: people’s initiative to reverse biodiversity loss Parks 16 43-48
[9]  
DeFries R(1994)Parks and people: livelihood issues in national parks management in Thailand and Madagascar Development and Change 25 195-229
[10]  
Hansen A(2007)Conserving what and for whom? Why conservation should help meet basic human needs in the tropics Biotropica 39 567-574