Circular economy assessment tool for end of life product recovery strategies

被引：69

作者：

Alamerew Y.A. ^{[1
]}

Brissaud D. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, G-SCOP, Grenoble

来源：

Journal of Remanufacturing | 2019年 / 9卷 / 3期

基金：

欧盟地平线“2020”;

关键词：

Circular economy; End of life strategy; Multi-criteria decision methodology; Product recovery; Remanufacturing;

D O I：

10.1007/s13243-018-0064-8

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Circular Economy (CE) aims to maintain the value of products, components, materials, and resources in the economy for as long as possible. Current end of life (EoL) product circularity decision-making methods are focused on technical and economic factors neglecting other crucial areas such as legislative pressure and customer demand, which are pertinent in the decision-making process. This paper presents a decision-making method to evaluate end of life product circularity alternatives at strategic level. A Product Recovery Multi-Criteria Decision Tool (PR-MCDT) is proposed to evaluate product circularity strategies from an integrated point of view, i.e. by simultaneously taking into account technical, economic, environmental, business, and societal aspects. The paper also identifies key end of life decision-making factors to assess product recovery strategies. An illustrative example is presented and discussed to show the applicability of the tool for the selection of product recovery options. A PR-MCDT is used at the senior/middle management level to ensure strategic decisions, which then promote success of the company. © 2018, The Author(s).

引用

页码：169 / 185

页数：16

共 44 条

[1]

Alamerew Y.A., Brissaud D., Evaluation of remanufacturing for product recovery: multi-criteria decision tool for end-of-life selection strategy, 3rd International Conference on Remanufacturing, (2017)

[2]

Alamerew Y.A., Brissaud D., Modelling and assessment of product recovery strategies through systems dynamics, Procedia CIRP, 69, pp. 822-826, (2018)

[3]

Asif F.M.A., Circular manufacturing systems: a development framework with analysis methods and tools for implementation, (2017)

[4]

Bocken N.M.P., Olivetti E.A., Cullen J.M., Potting J., Lifset R., Taking the circularity to the next level: a special issue on the circular economy, J Ind Ecol, 21, pp. 476-482, (2017)

[5]

Bufardi A., Sakara D., Gheorghe R., Kiritsis D., Xirouchakis P., Multiple criteria decision aid for selecting the best product end of life scenario, Int J Comput Integr Manuf, 16, pp. 526-534, (2003)

[6]

Bufardi A., Gheorghe R., Kiritsis D., Xirouchakis P., Multicriteria decision-aid approach for product end-of-life alternative selection, Int J Prod Res, 42, pp. 3139-3157, (2004)

[7]

Cao H., Zhang L., Liu F., Deployment model for part reuse in customized design of remanufactured products, Responsive Manuf - Green Manuf (ICRM 2010), 5th Int Conf, pp. 7-12, (2010)

[8]

Chen J.L., Wu J., Neural network model for product end-of-life strategies, IEEE Int Symp Electron Environ, pp. 159-164, (2003)

[9]

Diaz R., Marsillac E., Evaluating strategic remanufacturing supply chain decisions, Int J Prod Res, 55, 9, pp. 2522-2539, (2017)

[10]

Doyle K., Ijomah W.L., Antony J., Identifying the end of life decision making factors, Des. Innov. Value Towar. a Sustain. Soc., (2012)

← 1 2 3 4 5 →