Who explicitly requests the ordering of computed tomography for emergency department patients? A multicenter prospective study

被引:8
作者
Broder J.S. [1 ]
Bhat R. [2 ]
Boyd J.P. [1 ]
Ogloblin I.A. [3 ]
Limkakeng A. [1 ]
Hocker M.B. [1 ]
Drake W.G. [1 ]
Miller T. [2 ]
Harringa J.B. [4 ,5 ]
Repplinger M.D. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Division of Emergency Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
[2] Department of Emergency Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital and Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC
[3] Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore
[4] Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 800 University Bay Drive, Suite 310, Mail Code 9123, Madison, 53705, WI
[5] Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, 53792, WI
关键词
Computed tomography; Decision support; Emergency department; Utilization;
D O I
10.1007/s10140-016-1382-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Emergency department (ED) computed tomography (CT) use has increased substantially in recent years, resulting in increased radiation exposure for patients. Few studies have assessed which parties contribute to CT ordering in the ED. The objective of this study was to determine the proportion of CT scans ordered due to explicit requests by various stakeholders in ED patient care. This is a prospective, observational study performed at three university hospital EDs. CT scans ordered during research assistant hours were eligible for inclusion. Attending emergency physicians (EPs) completed standardized data forms to indicate all parties who had explicitly requested that a specific CT be performed. Forms were completed before the CT results were known in order to minimize bias. Data were obtained from 77 EPs regarding 944 CTs. The parties most frequently requesting CTs were attending EPs (82.0 %, 95 % CI 79.4–84.3), resident physicians (28.6 %, 95 % CI 25.8–31.6), consulting physicians (24.4 %, 95 % CI 21.7–27.2), and admitting physicians (3.9 %, 95 % CI 2.9–5.4). In the 168 instances in which the attending EP did not explicitly request the CT, requests most commonly came from consulting physicians (51.2 %, 95 % CI 43.7–58.6), resident physicians in the ED (39.9 %, 95 % CI 32.8–47.4), and admitting physicians (8.9 %, 95 % CI 5.5–14.2). EPs were the sole party requesting CT in 46.2 % of cases while multiple parties were involved in 39.0 %. Patients, families, and radiologists were uncommon sources of such requests. Emergency physicians requested the majority of CTs, though nearly 20 % were actually not desired by them. Admitting, consulting, and resident physicians in the ED were important contributors to CT utilization. © 2016, American Society of Emergency Radiology.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 227
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Head injuries in prehospital and Emergency Department settings: a prospective multicenter cross-sectional study in France
    Dubucs, Xavier
    Lafon, Thomas
    Adam, Romain
    Loth, Solene
    Tabaka, Flore
    Negrello, Florian
    Sebbane, Mustapha
    Boucher, Valerie
    Mercier, Eric
    Emond, Marcel
    Charpentier, Sandrine
    Balen, Frederic
    BMC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [42] Clinical impact of computed tomography in the emergency department in nontraumatic chest and abdominal conditions
    Pescatori L.C.
    Brambati M.
    Messina C.
    Mauri G.
    Di Leo G.
    Silvestri E.
    Sardanelli F.
    Sconfienza L.M.
    Emergency Radiology, 2018, 25 (4) : 393 - 398
  • [43] An assessment of repeat computed tomography utilization in the emergency department in the setting of blunt trauma
    Burla M.J.
    Boura J.
    Qu L.
    Ditkoff J.S.
    Berger D.A.
    Emergency Radiology, 2018, 25 (5) : 499 - 504
  • [44] Chief complaints and computed tomography results in the emergency department: a three-year retrospective cohort study
    Fan, Cheng-Yi
    Chen, Chi-Hsin
    Chen, Jiun-Wei
    Chang, Jia-How
    Huang, Edward Pei-Chuan
    Sung, Chih-Wei
    BMC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [45] Variation in emergency department use of computed tomography for investigation of acute aortic dissection
    Ohle R.
    Anjum O.
    Bleeker H.
    Wells G.
    Perry J.J.
    Emergency Radiology, 2018, 25 (3) : 293 - 298
  • [46] Impact on trauma patient management of installing a computed tomography scanner in the emergency department
    Lee, K. L.
    Graham, Colin A.
    Lam, Jenny M. Y.
    Yeung, Janice H. H.
    Ahuja, A. T.
    Rainer, Timothy H.
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2009, 40 (08): : 873 - 875
  • [47] Increasing utilization of computed tomography in the adult emergency department, 2000-2005
    Broder J.
    Warshauer D.M.
    Emergency Radiology, 2006, 13 (1) : 25 - 30
  • [48] Computed tomography utilization rates after the placement of a scanner in an emergency department: A single-center experience
    Runde D.
    Shah K.
    Naraghi L.
    Godbout B.
    Kirschner J.
    Newman D.
    Wiener D.
    Lee J.
    Emergency Radiology, 2014, 21 (5) : 473 - 478
  • [49] Increasing utilization of computed tomography in the pediatric emergency department, 2000-2006
    Broder J.
    Fordham L.A.
    Warshauer D.M.
    Emergency Radiology, 2007, 14 (4) : 227 - 232
  • [50] Diagnostic and prognostic value of cardiac troponins in emergency department patients presenting after a fall: A prospective, multicenter study
    Espejo, Tanguy
    Terhalle, Lukas
    Malinovska, Alexandra
    Riedel, Henk B.
    Arntz, Laura
    Hafner, Livia
    Delport-Lehnen, Karen
    Zuppinger, Joanna
    Geigy, Nicolas
    Leuppi, Jorg
    Somasundaram, Rajan
    Bingisser, Roland
    Nickel, Christian H.
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2024, 31 (09) : 860 - 869