Impact of TET2, SRSF2, ASXL1 and SETBP1 mutations on survival of patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia

被引:27
作者
Cui Y. [1 ,2 ]
Tong H. [3 ]
Du X. [4 ]
Li B. [1 ,2 ]
Gale R. [5 ]
Qin T. [1 ]
Liu J. [2 ]
Xu Z. [1 ,2 ]
Zhang Y. [1 ,2 ]
Huang G. [6 ]
Jin J. [3 ]
Fang L. [1 ]
Zhang H. [1 ]
Pan L. [1 ]
Hu N. [6 ]
Qu S. [1 ]
Xiao Z. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, MDS and MPN Center, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, 288 Nanjing Road, Tianjin
[2] Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Tianjin
[3] The First Affiliated Hospital, ZheJiang University College of Medicine, Department of Hematology, Zhejiang
[4] Guangdong General Hospital, Department of Hematology, Guangzhou
[5] Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hematology Research Center, Division of Experimental Medicine, London
[6] Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Divisions of Experimental Hematology and Cancer Biology, Cincinnati, OH
基金
高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia; Mutation; Prognostic model;
D O I
10.1186/s40164-015-0009-y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a myeloid neoplasm classified in the myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MDS/MPN) category. Molecular abnormalities are reported in about 90 % of patients with CMML. ASXL1 and SETBP1 mutations, but not TET2 or SFRS2 mutations are reported to be associated with prognosis. Methods: We studied frequency of TET2, SRSF2, ASXL1 and SETBP1 mutations in 145 patients with CMML using Sanger sequencing, and determined the prognostic factors for OS. We also identified the predictive value of ASXL1 mutations (frameshift and nonsense mutations) through comparing the Mayo Prognostic Model with the Mayo Molecular Model. Results: Forty-seven (32 %) had a mutation in TET2, 42 (29 %), a mutation in SRSF2, 65 (45 %), a mutation (nonsense and frame-shift) in ASXL1 and 26 (18 %), a mutation in SETBP1. Significant variables in multivariable analysis of survival included ASXL1 (HR = 1.99 [1.20-3.28]; P = 0.007), hemoglobin <100 g/L (HR = 2.42 [1.40-4.19]; P = 0.002) and blood immature myeloid cells (IMCs) (HR = 2.08 [1.25-3.46]; P = 0.005). When our patients were analyzed using the Mayo Prognostic Model median OS were not reached, 26 months and 15 months (P = 0.014). An analysis using the Mayo Molecular Model identified 4 cohorts with median OS of not reached, 70 months, 26 months and 11 months (P < 0.001). Data fitting using our patients suggest the Molecular Mayo Model has significantly higher survival predictive power compared with Mayo Prognostic Model (P < 0.001, -2 log-likelihood ratios of 538.070 and 552.260). Conclusions: There were high frequencies of mutations in TET2, SRSF2, ASXL1 and SETBP1 in patients with CMML. With the addition of ASXL1 frameshift and nonsense mutations, the Mayo Molecular Model fitted better than Mayo Prognostic Model of our patients. © Cui et al.; licensee BioMed Central.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Swederlow S., Campo E., Harris N.L., Jaffe E.S., Pileri S.A., Stein H., Et al., WHO Classification of Tumours of Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues, (2008)
[2]  
Patnaik M.M., Parikh S.A., Hanson C.A., Tefferi A., Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: a concise clinical and pathophysiological review, Br J Hematol., 165, pp. 273-286, (2014)
[3]  
Itzykson R., Kosmider O., Renneville A., Morabito M., Preudhomme C., Berthon C., Et al., Clonal architecture of chronic myelomonocytic leukemias, Blood., 121, pp. 2186-2198, (2013)
[4]  
Itzykson R., Kosmider O., Renneville A., Gelsi-Boyer V., Meggendorfer M., Morabito M., Et al., Prognostic score including gene mutations in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, J Clin Oncol., 31, pp. 2428-2436, (2013)
[5]  
Gelsi-Boyer V., Trouplin V., Adelaide J., Bonansea J., Cervera N., Carbuccia N., Et al., Mutations of polycomb-associated gene ASXL1 in myelodysplastic syndromes and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, Br J Hematol., 145, pp. 788-800, (2009)
[6]  
Laborde R.R., Patnaik M.M., Lasho T.L., Finke C.M., Hanson C.A., Knudson R.A., Et al., SETBP1 mutations in 415 patients with primary myelofibrosis or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: independent prognostic impact in CMML, Leukemia., 27, pp. 2100-2102, (2013)
[7]  
Meggendorfer M., Roller A., Haferlach T., Eder C., Dicker F., Grossmann V., Et al., SRSF2 mutations in 275 cases with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), Blood., 120, pp. 3080-3088, (2012)
[8]  
Onida F., Kantarjian H.M., Smith T.L., Ball G., Keating M.J., Estey E.H., Et al., Prognostic factors and scoring systems in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: a retrospective analysis of 213 patients, Blood., 99, pp. 840-849, (2002)
[9]  
Such E., Germing U., Malcovati L., Cervera J., Kuendgen A., Della P.M., Et al., Development and validation of a prognostic scoring system for patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, Blood., 121, pp. 3005-3015, (2013)
[10]  
Patnaik M.M., Padron E., LaBorde R.R., Lasho T.L., Finke C.M., Hanson C.A., Et al., Mayo prognostic model for WHO-defined chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: ASXL1 and spliceosome component mutations and outcomes, Leukemia., 27, pp. 1504-1510, (2013)