Logical form and logical space in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus

被引:0
作者
Oliver Thomas Spinney
机构
[1] The University of Manchester,
来源
Synthese | 2022年 / 200卷
关键词
Wittgenstein; Logical form; Propositions; Representation; Logical space;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this article I offer a novel explanation of Wittgenstein’s claim, in his Tractatus, that to represent the logical form of a proposition would require our being positioned outside of logic. The account here presented aims to exploit a connection, widely noticed, between the logical forms of objects and those of the propositions in which the names of those objects figure. I show that the logical forms of propositions may, on Wittgenstein’s view, be identified with places in logical space, and that places in logical space are reducible to the forms of both objects and their names. I argue, though, that according to Wittgenstein the representation of a proposition’s logical form would require the existence of a place in logical space not so reducible. I conclude that on Wittgenstein’s position, the attempt to represent logical forms cannot, therefore, succeed.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
Hart WD(1971)The whole sense of the Journal of Philosophy 68 273-288
[2]  
Johnston C(2007)Symbols in Wittgenstein's tractatus European Journal of Philosophy 15 367-394
[3]  
Johnston C(2009)Tractarian objects and logical categories Synthese 167 145-161
[4]  
Morris M(2016)The substance argument of Wittgenstein’s tractatus Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 4 1-13
[5]  
Morris M(2017)Representation and reality in Wittgenstein’s tractatus Teorema 36 123-133
[6]  
Plourde J(2016)States of affairs, facts, and situations in Wittgenstein’s Philosophia 44 181-203
[7]  
Plourde J(2017)Wittgenstein’s picture theory and the distinction between representing and depicting International Journal of Philosophical Studies 25 16-39
[8]  
Proops I(2004)Wittgenstein on the substance of the world European Journal for Philosophy 12 106-126
[9]  
Tejedor C(2003)Sense and simplicity: Wittgenstein’s argument for simple objects Ratio 16 272-289
[10]  
White R(1973)Can whether one proposition makes sense depend on the truth of another? Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 7 14-29