Local lens for SDG implementation: lessons from bottom-up approaches in Africa

被引:0
作者
Amanda Jiménez-Aceituno
Garry D. Peterson
Albert V. Norström
Grace Y. Wong
Andrea S. Downing
机构
[1] Stockholm University,Stockholm Resilience Centre
来源
Sustainability Science | 2020年 / 15卷
关键词
2030 Agenda; Sustainable Development Goals (SDG); Interactions; Bottom-up; Local initiatives; Africa;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Anthropocene presents a set of interlinked sustainability challenges for humanity. The United Nations 2030 Agenda has identified 17 specific Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as a way to confront these challenges. However, local initiatives have long been addressing issues connected to these goals in a myriad of diverse and innovative ways. We present a new approach to assess how local initiatives contribute to achieving the SDGs. We analyse how many, and how frequently, different SDGs and targets are addressed in a set of African initiatives. We consider goals and targets addressed by the same initiative as interacting between them. Then, we cluster the SDGs based on the combinations of goals and targets addressed by the initiatives and explore how SDGs differ in how local initiatives engage with them. We identify 5 main groups: SDGs addressed by broad-scope projects, SDGs addressed by specific projects, SDGs as means of implementation, cross-cutting SDGs and underrepresented SDGs. Goal 11 (sustainable cities & communities) is not clustered with any other goal. Finally, we explore the nuances of these groups and discuss the implications and relevance for the SDG framework to consider bottom-up approaches. Efforts to monitor the success on implementing the SDGs in local contexts should be reinforced and consider the different patterns initiatives follow to address the goals. Additionally, achieving the goals of the 2030 Agenda will require diversity and alignment of bottom-up and top-down approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:729 / 743
页数:14
相关论文
共 83 条
  • [1] Allen C(2019)Prioritising SDG targets: assessing baselines, gaps and interlinkages Sustain Sci 14 421-438
  • [2] Metternicht G(2016)Bright spots: seeds of a good Anthropocene Front Ecol Environ 14 441-448
  • [3] Wiedmann T(2016)Cross-sectoral strategies in global sustainability governance: towards a nexus approach Int Environ Agreem Polit Law Econ 16 449-464
  • [4] Bennett EM(2017)Policy coherence to achieve the SDGs: using integrated simulation models to assess effective policies Sustain Sci 12 921-931
  • [5] Solan M(2017)Social-ecological resilience and biosphere-based sustainability science Ecol Soc 21 41-32
  • [6] Biggs R(2012)Polycentric systems and interacting planetary boundaries—emerging governance of climate change-ocean acidification-marine biodiversity Ecol Econ 81 21-1274
  • [7] Boas I(2002)Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study Res Policy 31 1257-417
  • [8] Biermann F(2007)Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways Res Policy 36 399-840
  • [9] Kanie N(2019)Priorities and interactions of sustainable development goals (SDGs) with focus on wetlands Water 11 619-187
  • [10] Collste D(2014)Typology of public outreach for biodiversity conservation projects in Spain Conserv Biol 28 829-204