Short-term perioperative outcomes after robot-assisted and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy

被引:42
作者
Benizri E.I. [1 ,2 ]
Germain A. [1 ]
Ayav A. [1 ]
Bernard J.-L. [2 ]
Zarnegar R. [3 ]
Benchimol D. [2 ]
Bresler L. [1 ]
Brunaud L. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Department of Hepatobiliary, Digestive and Endocrine Surgery, Université de Lorraine, CHU Nancy-Brabois (Adultes), Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy
[2] Department of General Surgery and Digestive Cancerology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Hôpital de l'Archet 2, 06000 Nice Cedex 3, 151 Route de Saint Antoine de Ginestiere
[3] Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College, NY, NY
[4] Université de Lorraine, Inserm, U954, University of Nancy, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy
关键词
Distal pancreatectomy; Laparoscopy; Learning curve; Morbidity; Robotics;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-013-0438-8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Robotic surgery offers potential technical advantages that may facilitate pancreatic resection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the learning curve and short-term perioperative outcomes in patients who underwent laparoscopic and robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy. All perioperative variables were evaluated and compared retrospectively between laparoscopic (LDP) (n = 23) and robot-assisted (RDP) (n = 11) distal pancreatectomy. The mean total operative time was shorter in LDP (194 vs. 225 min; p = 0.017). All other perioperative criteria were similar between LDP and RDP patients (blood loss, transfusion rate, conversion, pancreatic fistula, postoperative morbidity, and duration of hospitalization). Non-adjusted CUSUM curve for composite events including operative time, conversion, postoperative morbidity and reoperation rates showed that the RDP learning curve corresponded to the first seven consecutive patients. During early experience, RDP was associated with longer operative time but similar short-term perioperative outcomes compared to conventional distal pancreatectomy. © 2013 Springer-Verlag London.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 132
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[11]  
Dindo D., Demartine N., Clavien P.A., Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey, Ann Surg, 240, pp. 205-213, (2004)
[12]  
Bassi C., Dervenis C., Butturini G., Fingerhut A., Yeo C., Izbicki J., Neoptolemos J., Sarr M., Traverso W., Buchler M., Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition, Surgery, 138, pp. 8-13, (2005)
[13]  
Noyez L., Control charts, Cusum techniques and funnel plots. A review of methods for monitoring performance in healthcare, Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 9, pp. 494-499, (2009)
[14]  
Sa Cunha A., Rault A., Beau C., Laurent C., Collet D., Masson B., A single institution prospective study of laparoscopic pancreatic resection, Arch Surg, 143, pp. 289-295, (2008)
[15]  
Kneuertz P.J., Patel S.H., Chu C.K., Fisher S.B., Maithel S.K., Sarmiento J.M., Weber S.M., Staley C.A., Kooby D.A., Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: trends and lessons learned through an 11-year experience, J Am Coll Surg, 215, pp. 167-176, (2012)
[16]  
Iacobone M., Citton M., Nitti D., Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: up-to-date and literature review, World J Gastroenterol, 18, pp. 5329-5337, (2012)
[17]  
Kleeff J., Diener M.K., Z'Graggen, Hinz U., Wagner M., Bachmann J., Zehetner J., Muller M.W., Friess H., Buchler M.W., Distal pancreatectomy: risk factors for surgical failure in 302 consecutive cases, Ann Surg, 245, pp. 573-582, (2007)
[18]  
DeOliveira M.L., Winter J.M., Schafer M., Cunningham S.C., Cameron J.L., Yeo C.J., Clavien P.A., Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: a novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy, Ann Surg, 244, pp. 931-937, (2006)
[19]  
Velanovich V., Case-control comparison of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy, Gastrointest Surg, 10, pp. 95-98, (2006)
[20]  
Sierzega M., Niekowal B., Kulig J., Popiela T., Nutritional status affects the rate of pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: a multivariate analysis of 132 patients, J Am Coll Surg, 205, pp. 52-59, (2007)