Source sector and fuel contributions to ambient PM2.5 and attributable mortality across multiple spatial scales

被引:0
作者
Erin E. McDuffie
Randall V. Martin
Joseph V. Spadaro
Richard Burnett
Steven J. Smith
Patrick O’Rourke
Melanie S. Hammer
Aaron van Donkelaar
Liam Bindle
Viral Shah
Lyatt Jaeglé
Gan Luo
Fangqun Yu
Jamiu A. Adeniran
Jintai Lin
Michael Brauer
机构
[1] Washington University in St. Louis,Department of Energy, Environmental, and Chemical Engineering
[2] Dalhousie University,Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science
[3] Spadaro Environmental Research Consultants (SERC),Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation
[4] University of Washington,Joint Global Change Research Institute
[5] Pacific Northwest National Laboratory,Department of Atmospheric Sciences
[6] University of Washington,Atmospheric Sciences Research Center
[7] University at Albany,Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, School of Physics
[8] Peking University,School of Population and Public Health
[9] University of British Columbia,Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences
[10] Harvard University,undefined
来源
Nature Communications | / 12卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is the world’s leading environmental health risk factor. Reducing the PM2.5 disease burden requires specific strategies that target dominant sources across multiple spatial scales. We provide a contemporary and comprehensive evaluation of sector- and fuel-specific contributions to this disease burden across 21 regions, 204 countries, and 200 sub-national areas by integrating 24 global atmospheric chemistry-transport model sensitivity simulations, high-resolution satellite-derived PM2.5 exposure estimates, and disease-specific concentration response relationships. Globally, 1.05 (95% Confidence Interval: 0.74–1.36) million deaths were avoidable in 2017 by eliminating fossil-fuel combustion (27.3% of the total PM2.5 burden), with coal contributing to over half. Other dominant global sources included residential (0.74 [0.52–0.95] million deaths; 19.2%), industrial (0.45 [0.32–0.58] million deaths; 11.7%), and energy (0.39 [0.28–0.51] million deaths; 10.2%) sectors. Our results show that regions with large anthropogenic contributions generally had the highest attributable deaths, suggesting substantial health benefits from replacing traditional energy sources.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 94 条
[1]  
Yokelson RJ(2020)Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 Lancet 396 1223-1249
[2]  
Johnston FH(2009)Emissions from biomass burning in the Yucatan Atmos. Chem. Phys. 9 5785-5812
[3]  
McDuffie EE(2012)Estimated global mortality attributable to smoke from landscape fires Environ. Health Perspect. 120 695-701
[4]  
Womack CC(2020)A global anthropogenic emission inventory of atmospheric pollutants from sector- and fuel-specific sources (1970–2017): an application of the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS) Earth Syst. Sci. Data 12 3413-3442
[5]  
Lu K(2019)An odd oxygen framework for wintertime ammonium nitrate aerosol pollution in urban areas: NOx and VOC control as mitigation strategies Geophys. Res. Lett. 46 4971-4979
[6]  
Liang CK(2019)Fast photochemistry in wintertime haze: consequences for pollution mitigation strategies Environ. Sci. Technol. 53 10676-10684
[7]  
Zhang Q(2018)HTAP2 multi-model estimates of premature human mortality due to intercontinental transport of air pollution and emission sectors Atmos. Chem. Phys. 18 10497-10520
[8]  
Meng J(2017)Transboundary health impacts of transported global air pollution and international trade Nature 543 705-709
[9]  
West JJ(2019)Source contributions to ambient fine particulate matter for Canada Environ. Sci. Technol. 53 10269-10278
[10]  
Watson JG(2016)What we breathe impacts our health: improving understanding of the link between air pollution and health Environ. Sci. Technol. 50 4895-4904