Creating Shared Value Through an Inclusive Development Lens: A Case Study of a CSV Strategy in Ghana’s Cocoa Sector

被引:0
作者
David Ollivier de Leth
Mirjam A. F. Ros-Tonen
机构
[1] University of Amsterdam,International Development Studies
[2] University of Amsterdam,Department of Geography, Planning and International Development Studies
来源
Journal of Business Ethics | 2022年 / 178卷
关键词
Creating shared value; Inclusivity; Inclusive development; Cocoa; Ghana; Nestlé;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Despite the widespread popularity of the Creating Shared Value (CSV) discourse, its ‘business case’ and ‘win–win’ rhetoric remain problematic. This paper adds an inclusive development perspective to the debate, arguing that analysing CSV strategies through an inclusivity lens contributes to a better operationalisation of societal value; makes tensions and contradictions between economic and societal value explicit and uncovers processes of inclusion, exclusion and adverse inclusion. We illustrate this by analysing Nestlé’s CSV strategy in its cocoa supply chains in Ghana based on content analysis of company documents, interviews with value chain actors and stakeholders, and focus groups with farmers. We ask how Nestlé frames and implements its CSV discourse in practice and how this relates to the social, relational and environmental dimensions of inclusive development. Findings show how the company addresses inclusive development dimensions in its corporate discourse, practices and business operations, and what trade-offs it faces. We then unmask the inherent tension between business objectives and societal interests and explain why the scope, issues addressed and societal impacts of CSV remain constrained. We conclude that CSV can help reduce a company’s impact on some persistent societal issues, but that its contribution to transformational change remains limited because the need to uphold competitive advantages and short-term financial performance narrows its ability to address all inclusivity dimensions. Legislation mandating responsible business conduct and due diligence can reduce this inherent tension by levelling the playing field between companies addressing inclusivity issues vis-à-vis those who do not.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 354
页数:15
相关论文
共 98 条
[1]  
Aakhus M(2012)Revisiting the role of “shared value” in the business-society relationship Business and Professional Ethics Journal 31 231-246
[2]  
Bzdak M(2016)Conceptualising corporate community development Third World Quarterly 37 245-263
[3]  
Banks G(2013)Creating shared value : The one-trick pony approach-A comment on Michael Porter and Mark Kramer Business Ethics Journal Review 1 106-112
[4]  
Scheyvens R(2014)Business as a development agent: Evidence of possibility and improbability Third World Quarterly 35 22-42
[5]  
McLennan S(2010)Integrating poverty and environmental concerns into value-chain analysis. A conceptual framework Development Policy Review 28 173-194
[6]  
Bebbington A(2009)Document analysis as a qualitative research method Quality Research Journal 9 27-40
[7]  
Beschorner T(2017)Simulacra and sustainability disclosure: Analysis of the interpretative models of creating shared Value Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 24 414-434
[8]  
Blowfield M(2014)Contesting the value of ‘Creating Shared Value’ California Management Review 56 130-153
[9]  
Dolan CS(2019)The limits of the business case for sustainability: Don’t count on ‘Creating Shared Value’ to extinguish corporate destruction Journal of Cleaner Production 221 785-794
[10]  
Bolwig S(2017)Beyond the “Win-Win” California Management Review 59 142-167