A framework for stakeholder engagement during systematic reviews and maps in environmental management

被引:0
作者
N. R. Haddaway
C. Kohl
N. Rebelo da Silva
J. Schiemann
A. Spök
R. Stewart
J. B. Sweet
R. Wilhelm
机构
[1] Mistra EviEM,Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants
[2] Stockholm Environment Institute,CEE Jo’burg, Centre for Anthropological Research (CfAR)
[3] Julius Kühn-Institut (JKI),undefined
[4] University of Johannesburg,undefined
[5] Alpen-Adria Universität Klagenfurt|Wien Graz and IFZ-Inter-University Research Centre for Technology,undefined
[6] Work and Culture,undefined
[7] JT Environmental Consultants (JTEC),undefined
来源
Environmental Evidence | / 6卷
关键词
Stakeholders; Communication; Dissemination; Methodology; Best practice; Conflict resolution; Stakeholder analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
People have a stake in conservation and environmental management both for their own interests and the sake of the environment itself. Environmental decision-making has changed somewhat in recent decades to account for unintentional impacts on human wellbeing. The involvement of stakeholders in environmental projects has been recognised as critical for ensuring their success and equally for the syntheses of evidence of what works, where, and for whom, providing key benefits and challenges. As a result of increased interest in systematic reviews of complex management issues, there is a need for guidance in best practices for stakeholder engagement. Here, we propose a framework for stakeholder engagement in systematic reviews/systematic maps, highlighting recommendations and advice that are critical for effective, efficient and meaningful engagement of stakeholders. The discussion herein aims to provide a toolbox of stakeholder engagement activities, whilst also recommending approaches from stakeholder engagement research that may prove to be particularly useful for systematic reviews and systematic maps.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]  
Reed MS(2008)Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review Biol Conserv 141 2417-2431
[2]  
Sterling EJ(2017)Assessing the evidence for stakeholder engagement in biodiversity conservation Biol Conserv 209 159-171
[3]  
Betley E(2008)Participatory indicator development: what can ecologists and local communities learn from each other Ecol Appl 18 1253-1269
[4]  
Sigouin A(2006)Learning from doing participatory rural research: lessons from the Peak District National Park J Agric Econ 57 259-275
[5]  
Gomez A(2010)Linking degradation assessment to sustainable land management: a decision support system for Kalahari pastoralists J Arid Environ 74 149-155
[6]  
Toomey A(2008)Institutional evolution in Lake Okeechobee management in Florida: characteristics, impacts, and limitations Water Resour Manag 22 699-718
[7]  
Cullman G(2005)Applying evidence-based practice in conservation management: lessons from the first systematic review and dissemination projects Biol Conserv 126 270-278
[8]  
Malone C(2013)Human well-being impacts of terrestrial protected areas Environ Evid 2 19-51
[9]  
Pekor A(2016)A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences Environ Evid 5 7-53
[10]  
Arengo F(2015)Public involvement in research: making sense of the diversity J Health Serv Res Policy 20 45-1949