Life cycle environmental performance of two restaurant food waste management strategies at Shenzhen, China

被引:1
|
作者
Qianqian Yu
Huan Li
机构
[1] Tsinghua University,Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School
关键词
Anaerobic digestion; Incineration; Municipal solid waste; Food waste; Life cycle assessment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Restaurant food waste (RFW) can be separated from other municipal solid waste (MSW) for individual treatment or treated together with other MSW, and it is disputed which option is the optimal strategy for MSW management in the practice of Shenzhen, China. To weigh pros and cons of RFW separation, a hybrid life cycle assessment is conducted to compare (S1) all MSW incineration and (S2) individual anaerobic digestion of RFW and other MSW incineration referring to the real situation. The results show that S2 reduces 10.6% carbon emission than S1, mainly owing to higher heat value of incineration feedstock and higher yield of electricity. In addition, the cumulative energy demands of S1 and S2 are − 6290 and − 6544 MJ/t MSW, and their energy efficiencies are 67.4 and 70.3%, respectively. Moreover, RFW separation reduces acidic gases emission due to the substitution effect of more energy products. Overall, source sorting of RFW is a sustainable model of MSW management at Shenzhen, and the result provides quantitative support for the strategy of RFW separation from MSW.
引用
收藏
页码:826 / 839
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An Investigation of Demolition Waste Management: Case of Shenzhen in China
    Wu, Huanyu
    Yuan, Hongping
    Wang, Jiayuan
    Ouyang, Lei
    Li, Zhengdao
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ADVANCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND REAL ESTATE, 2017, : 1157 - 1167
  • [32] Life cycle assessment of waste treatment strategy for sewage sludge and food waste in Macau: perspectives on environmental and energy production performance
    Sam L. H. Chiu
    Irene M. C. Lo
    Kok Sin Woon
    Dickson Y. S. Yan
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2016, 21 : 176 - 189
  • [33] Life cycle assessment of waste treatment strategy for sewage sludge and food waste in Macau: perspectives on environmental and energy production performance
    Chiu, Sam L. H.
    Lo, Irene M. C.
    Woon, Kok Sin
    Yan, Dickson Y. S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2016, 21 (02): : 176 - 189
  • [34] Sustainability strategies of waste management of petroleum using life cycle analysis
    Chongchongprasert, Putthita
    Khaodhiar, Sutha
    Charoensaeng, Ampira
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 258
  • [35] An Environmental Assessment of Municipal Solid Waste Management Strategies in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: A Comparative Life Cycle Analysis
    Almansour, Mohammed
    Akrami, Mohammad
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (20)
  • [36] Life cycle assessment of the food waste management with a focus on the collection bag
    Dolci, Giovanni
    Rigamonti, Lucia
    Grosso, Mario
    WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2021, 39 (10) : 1317 - 1327
  • [37] Evaluation of environmental impacts of food waste management by material flow analysis (MFA) and life cycle assessment (LCA)
    Yashoda Padeyanda
    Yong-Chul Jang
    Youngjae Ko
    Sora Yi
    Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 2016, 18 : 493 - 508
  • [38] Life cycle assessment of the present and proposed food waste management technologies from environmental and economic impact perspectives
    Ahamed, A.
    Yin, K.
    Ng, B. J. H.
    Ren, F.
    Chang, V. W. -C.
    Wang, J. -Y.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 131 : 607 - 614
  • [39] Evaluation of environmental impacts of food waste management by material flow analysis (MFA) and life cycle assessment (LCA)
    Padeyanda, Yashoda
    Jang, Yong-Chul
    Ko, Youngjae
    Yi, Sora
    JOURNAL OF MATERIAL CYCLES AND WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2016, 18 (03) : 493 - 508
  • [40] Life cycle assessment of biomedical waste management for reduced environmental impacts
    Deepak, Anurag
    Sharma, Varun
    Kumar, Dinesh
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 349