Potentials and constraints of different types of soil moisture observations for flood simulations in headwater catchments

被引:0
作者
Axel Bronstert
Benjamin Creutzfeldt
Thomas Graeff
Irena Hajnsek
Maik Heistermann
Sibylle Itzerott
Thomas Jagdhuber
David Kneis
Erika Lück
Dominik Reusser
Erwin Zehe
机构
[1] University of Potsdam,Institute for Earth and Environmental Sciences
[2] GFZ German Research Centre for Geoscience,ETH Zurich, Institute of Environmental Engineering, Schafmattstr. 6, 8093 Zurich
[3] Switzerland & German Aerospace Center,German Aerospace Centre
[4] Microwaves and Radar Institute,Karlsruhe Institute of Technology KIT
[5] GFZ German Research Centre for Geoscience,undefined
[6] Microwaves and Radar Institute,undefined
[7] Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research,undefined
[8] Institute of Water Resources and River Basin Management,undefined
来源
Natural Hazards | 2012年 / 60卷
关键词
Soil moisture; Remote sensing; Hydrological modelling; Flood forecasting; Soil moisture measurement comparison;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Flood generation in mountainous headwater catchments is governed by rainfall intensities, by the spatial distribution of rainfall and by the state of the catchment prior to the rainfall, e.g. by the spatial pattern of the soil moisture, groundwater conditions and possibly snow. The work presented here explores the limits and potentials of measuring soil moisture with different methods and in different scales and their potential use for flood simulation. These measurements were obtained in 2007 and 2008 within a comprehensive multi-scale experiment in the Weisseritz headwater catchment in the Ore-Mountains, Germany. The following technologies have been applied jointly thermogravimetric method, frequency domain reflectometry (FDR) sensors, spatial time domain reflectometry (STDR) cluster, ground-penetrating radar (GPR), airborne polarimetric synthetic aperture radar (polarimetric SAR) and advanced synthetic aperture radar (ASAR) based on the satellite Envisat. We present exemplary soil measurement results, with spatial scales ranging from point scale, via hillslope and field scale, to the catchment scale. Only the spatial TDR cluster was able to record continuous data. The other methods are limited to the date of over-flights (airplane and satellite) or measurement campaigns on the ground. For possible use in flood simulation, the observation of soil moisture at multiple scales has to be combined with suitable hydrological modelling, using the hydrological model WaSiM-ETH. Therefore, several simulation experiments have been conducted in order to test both the usability of the recorded soil moisture data and the suitability of a distributed hydrological model to make use of this information. The measurement results show that airborne-based and satellite-based systems in particular provide information on the near-surface spatial distribution. However, there are still a variety of limitations, such as the need for parallel ground measurements (Envisat ASAR), uncertainties in polarimetric decomposition techniques (polarimetric SAR), very limited information from remote sensing methods about vegetated surfaces and the non-availability of continuous measurements. The model experiments showed the importance of soil moisture as an initial condition for physically based flood modelling. However, the observed moisture data reflect the surface or near-surface soil moisture only. Hence, only saturated overland flow might be related to these data. Other flood generation processes influenced by catchment wetness in the subsurface such as subsurface storm flow or quick groundwater drainage cannot be assessed by these data. One has to acknowledge that, in spite of innovative measuring techniques on all spatial scales, soil moisture data for entire vegetated catchments are still today not operationally available. Therefore, observations of soil moisture should primarily be used to improve the quality of continuous, distributed hydrological catchment models that simulate the spatial distribution of moisture internally. Thus, when and where soil moisture data are available, they should be compared with their simulated equivalents in order to improve the parameter estimates and possibly the structure of the hydrological model.
引用
收藏
页码:879 / 914
页数:35
相关论文
共 238 条
  • [1] Aubert D(2003)Sequential assimilation of soil moisture and streamflow data in a conceptual rainfall-runoff model J Hydrol 280 145-161
  • [2] Loumagne C(2006)Soil moisture estimation using multi-incidence and multi-polarization ASAR data Int J Remote Sens 27 1907-1920
  • [3] Oudin L(2009)How crucial is it to account for the antecedent moisture conditions in flood forecasting? Comparison of event-based and continuous approaches on 178 catchments Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 13 819-831
  • [4] Baghdadi N(1979)A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology Hydrol Sci J 24 43-69
  • [5] Holah N(1995)Scale issues in hydrological modelling: a review Hydrol Proc 9 251-290
  • [6] Zribi M(2007)Hydrometeorological analysis of the August 29, 2003 flash flood in the eastern Italian Alps J Hydrometeorol 8 1049-1067
  • [7] Berthet L(2009)Antecedent wetness conditions based on ERS scatterometer data J Hydrol 364 73-87
  • [8] Andréassian V(1999)The role of spatial variability of soil moisture for modelling surface runoff generation at the small catchment scale Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 3 505-516
  • [9] Perrin C(2003)Uncertainty of runoff modeling at the hillslope scale due to temporal variations of rainfall intensity Phys Chem Earth 28 283-288
  • [10] Javelle P(2007)Scaled spatial variability of soil moisture fields Geophys Res Lett 34 L01401-518