A systematic review to assess the ‘treat-and-extend’ dosing regimen for neovascular age-related macular degeneration using ranibizumab

被引:0
作者
S R Rufai
H Almuhtaseb
R M Paul
B L Stuart
T Kendrick
H Lee
A J Lotery
机构
[1] Faculty of Medicine,
[2] University of Southampton,undefined
[3] Southampton Eye Unit,undefined
[4] University Hospital Southampton,undefined
来源
Eye | 2017年 / 31卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of irreversible blindness in the developed world. Monthly or as-needed (PRN) dosing strategies of intravitreal ranibizumab have been established as efficacious treatment options for neovascular AMD. More recently, the ‘treat-and-extend’ dosing regimen (TREX) is being adopted in clinical practice as it represents a patient-centric and economical option, reducing treatment burden by extending injection intervals when possible. However, the efficacy of TREX using ranibizumab monotherapy remains to be defined. Therefore, we performed a systematic review to assess the current evidence for TREX using ranibizumab by searching MEDLINE, Embase and PubMed. Of the 1733 articles identified, nine TREX studies were included in our analysis (n=748 eyes). Average patient age was 79.25 (range: 77.34–82.00; SD: 7.27). Baseline BCVA ranged from 48.5–68.9 ETDRS letters. BCVA improvement was 8.92 letters at 1 year (range: 6.5–11.5; SD: 7.54), as a weighted mean accounting for numbers of study eyes. The weighted mean number of injections at one year was 8.60 (range: 7.3–12.0; SD: 1.73). Previously, the landmark ANCHOR and MARINA trials reported gains of 11.3 and 7.2 letters, respectively, using monthly ranibizumab. Chin-Yee et al reported a gain of 3.5 ETDRS letters with 5.3 (S.D. 0.66) PRN ranibizumab injections as weighted means at 1 year in their recent systematic review. Our analysis suggests that TREX delivers visual outcomes superior to PRN and approaches similar efficacy to monthly injections. Further RCTs are needed to fully evaluate the efficacy and economy of TREX in the long-term.
引用
收藏
页码:1337 / 1344
页数:7
相关论文
共 149 条
[1]  
Friedman DS(2004)Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in the United States Arch Ophthalmol 122 564-572
[2]  
O'Colmain BJ(2012)Mechanisms of age-related macular degeneration Neuron 75 26-39
[3]  
Muñoz B(2008)The natural history and prognosis of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis Ophthalmology 115 116-126
[4]  
Tomany SC(2012)The estimated prevalence and incidence of late stage age related macular degeneration in the UK Br J Ophthalmol 96 752-756
[5]  
McCarty C(2009)VEGF-A: a critical regulator of blood vessel growth Eur Cytokine Netw 20 158-163
[6]  
de Jong PT(2006)Ranibizumab versus verteporfin for neovascular age-related macular degeneration N Engl J Med 355 1432-1444
[7]  
Ambati J(2011)Primary endpoint results of a phase II study of vascular endothelial growth factor trap-eye in wet age-related macular degeneration Ophthalmology 118 1089-1097
[8]  
Fowler BJ(2006)Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration N Engl J Med 355 1419-1431
[9]  
Wong TY(2016)Licence to save: a UK survey of anti-VEGF use for the eye in 2015 Eye 30 1404-1406
[10]  
Chakravarthy U(2014)The neovascular age-related macular degeneration database: multicenter study of 92 976 ranibizumab injections: report 1: visual acuity Ophthalmology 121 1092-1101