Environmental Inequality and Economic Valuation

被引:0
作者
Jasper N. Meya
机构
[1] Leipzig University,Department of Economics
[2] German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig,Biodiversity Economics Group
来源
Environmental and Resource Economics | 2020年 / 76卷
关键词
Inequality; WTP; Heterogeneously distributed public good; Spatial distribution; Benefit transfer; Forest ecosystem services; D63; Q51;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
I study how the economic value of a heterogeneously distributed environmental public good depends on how the endowment with this good and income are distributed. I find that the effect of environmental inequality on the societal willingness to pay (WTP) for the environmental good is determined both by its substitutability and by the correlation of its provision with income. Specifically, environmental inequality decreases societal WTP for substitutes, but this effect is reversed if the environmental good is a complement or distributed strongly in favour of richer households. Moreover, I show that richer households living in places where environmental good endowment is high increases (decreases) societal WTP if and only if the environmental good is a substitute for (complement to) consumption goods. I propose novel adjustment factors for structural benefit transfer to control for differences in the spatial distribution of environmental goods. Using forest preservation in Poland as an empirical example, I find that societal WTP is up to 4% higher for equal access to forests and up to 8% higher for an equal distribution of both income and access to forests.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 270
页数:35
相关论文
共 211 条
[1]  
Aaron H(1970)Public goods and income distribution Econometrica 38 907-919
[2]  
McGuire M(2008)When the Joneses’ consumption hurts: optimal public good provision and nonlinear income taxation J Public Econ 92 986-997
[3]  
Aronsson T(2004)Who lives on the wrong side of the environmental tracks? Evidence from the EPA’s risk-screening environmental indicators model Soc Sci Q 85 441-462
[4]  
Johansson-Stenman O(2019)Environmental justice: the economics of race, place, and pollution J Econ Perspect 33 185-208
[5]  
Ash M(2017)Is the income elasticity of the willingness to pay for pollution control constant? Environ Resource Econ 68 663-682
[6]  
Fetter TR(2011)Making benefit transfers work: deriving and testing principles for value transfers for similar and dissimilar sites using a case study of the non-market benefits of water quality improvements across Europe Environ Resource Econ 50 365-387
[7]  
Banzhaf S(2006)The aggregation of environmental benefit values: welfare measures, distance decay and total WTP Ecol Econ 60 450-460
[8]  
Ma L(2017)Income inequality and willingness to pay for environmental public goods J Environ Econ Manag 85 35-61
[9]  
Timmins C(2017)Subsistence, substitutability and sustainability in consumption Environ Resource Econ 67 47-66
[10]  
Barbier EB(2015)Ramsey Discounting of Ecosystem Services Environ Resource Econ 61 273-296