Learning from expository texts: Effects of the interaction of prior knowledge and text structure on responses to different question types

被引:0
作者
Françoise Armand
机构
[1] Université de Montréal,Faculté des sciences de l’éducation, Département de didactique
来源
European Journal of Psychology of Education | 2001年 / 16卷
关键词
Prior knowledge; Reading comprehension; Text structure;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The objective of this study was to verify the effects of the interaction between text structures and prior knowledge on memory and learning from expository texts. It examined the effects of two levels of prior knowledge and two types of mixed structures on a post-reading questionnaire. A total of 119 French-speaking, sixth-grade subjects were selected on the basis of a multiple-choice questionnaire. This questionnaire served to distinguish two groups, one possessing a high level of prior knowledge about the topic covered in the text (HP group), and another having a low level of prior knowledge (LP group). The children’s reading ability was evaluated by a cloze test that also served to eliminate children with reading comprehension difficulties from the experimental groups. The subjects in each group were arbitrarily assigned to subgroups. One group read an experimental passage, “The effects of acid rain on maple and pine”, which was organized in a collection inserted in cause/effect structure (SI). The other group read the same information, but which was organized in a comparison inserted in cause/effect structure (S2). The post-reading measure consisted of 24 questions that varied according to three criteria. The statistical analysis revealed that the effects of text structure were dependent on the level of prior knowledge and on the type of questions and confirmed that prior knowledge had a determining influence on knowledge acquisition.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 86
页数:19
相关论文
共 85 条
  • [1] Alexander P.A.(1991)Coming to terms: How researchers in learning and literacy talk about knowledge Review of Educational Research 61 315-343
  • [2] Schallert D.(1963)Comparison of different populations: resistance to extinction and transfer Psychological Bulletin 70 162-179
  • [3] Hare V.(1977)Frameworks for comprehending discourse American Educational Research Journal 14 367-381
  • [4] Anderson N.H.(1995)La compréhension de texte, un processus interactif? Revue de l’ACLA 17 85-105
  • [5] Anderson R.C.(1996)Ressources, capacités cognitives et mémoire de travail: Postulats, métaphores et modèles Psychologie Française 41 319-338
  • [6] Reynolds R.E.(1985)Text processing: The influence of text structure, background knowledge, and purpose Reading Research Quarterly 20 314-326
  • [7] Schallert D.L.(1990)Influence de la structure textuelle et de la redondance sur la lisibilité Revue canadienne de l’éducation 15 16-36
  • [8] Goetz E.T.(1997)Structures textuelles et niveaux d’expertise L’Année Psychologique 97 611-639
  • [9] Armand F.(1993)Working memory capacity as long-term memory activation: An individual-diffferences approach Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and cognition 5 1101-1114
  • [10] Ziarko H.(1979)Acquisition of domain-related information in relation to high and low domain knowledge Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18 257-273