Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the pediatric population: a review of technique, outcomes, complications, and special considerations in infants

被引:0
作者
William R. Boysen
Mohan S. Gundeti
机构
[1] The University of Chicago Medicine and Biological Sciences,Pediatric Urology, Comer Children’s Hospital
来源
Pediatric Surgery International | 2017年 / 33卷
关键词
Ureteropelvic junction obstruction; Pediatric urology; Minimally invasive surgery; Robotic surgery;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Ureteropelvic junction obstruction is a common condition encountered by the pediatric urologist, and treated with pyeloplasty when indicated. Recent technological advancements and a shift across all surgical fields to embrace minimally invasive surgery have led to increased utilization of minimally invasive pyeloplasty. Conventional laparoscopy is a reasonable choice, but its use is limited by the technical challenges of precise suturing in a confined space and the associated considerable learning curve. Robotic technology has simplified the minimally invasive approach to pyeloplasty, offering enhanced visualization and improved dexterity with a fairly short learning curve. As utilization of robotic pyeloplasty continues to increase, we sought to critically assess the literature on this approach. We begin with a review of the technical aspects of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty including tips for surgical proficiency and patient safety. Outcomes and complications from the contemporary literature are reviewed, as well as special considerations in the pediatric population including infant pyeloplasty, cost concerns, training, and postoperative diversion/drainage.
引用
收藏
页码:925 / 935
页数:10
相关论文
共 152 条
[31]  
Borer JG(2010)parental satisfaction after open versus robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: results from modified glasgow children’s benefit inventory survey J Urol 183 704-1667
[32]  
Peters CA(2011)Human capital gains associated with robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children compared to open pyeloplasty J Urol 186 1663-250
[33]  
Atug F(2013)Parent and patient perceptions of robotic vs open urological surgery scars in children J Urol 190 244-1086
[34]  
Woods M(2016)Surgical scar location preference for pediatric kidney and pelvic surgery: a crowdsourced survey J Urol 189 1083-2240
[35]  
Burgess SV(2013)Cost analysis of pediatric robot-assisted and laparoscopic pyeloplasty J Urol 176 2237-385
[36]  
Chang C(2006)Robot assisted pyeloplasty in the infant—lessons learned J Urol 10 380-e139.e5
[37]  
Steinberg Z(2014)Infant robotic pyeloplasty: comparison with an open cohort J Pediatr Urol 11 e1-2575
[38]  
Shah A(2015)Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: multi-institutional experience in infants J Pediatr Urol 178 2571-937
[39]  
Gundeti MS(2007)Failed pyeloplasty in children: comparative analysis of retrograde endopyelotomy versus redo pyeloplasty J Urol 188 932-e69.e6
[40]  
Dangle PP(2012)Robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair for failed pyeloplasty in children: a safe and highly effective treatment option J Urol 11 e1-e394.e7