New fitness sharing approach for multi-objective genetic algorithms

被引:0
作者
Hyoungjin Kim
Meng-Sing Liou
机构
[1] Science Applications International Corporation,Aeropropulsion Division
[2] NASA Glenn Research Center,undefined
来源
Journal of Global Optimization | 2013年 / 55卷
关键词
Genetic algorithms; Multi-objective optimization; Niching; Sharing Function;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A novel fitness sharing method for MOGA (Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm) is proposed by combining a new sharing function and sided degradations in the sharing process, with preference to either of two close solutions. The modified MOGA adopting the new sharing approach is named as MOGAS. Three different variants of MOGAS are tested; MOGASc, MOGASp and MOGASd, favoring children over parents, parents over children and solutions closer to the ideal point, respectively. The variants of MOGAS are compared with MOGA and other state-of-the-art multi-objective evolutionary algorithms such as IBEA, HypE, NSGA-II and SPEA2. The new method shows significant performance improvements from MOGA and is very competitive against other Evolutionary Multi-objective Algorithms (EMOAs) for the ZDT and DTLZ test functions with two and three objectives. Among the three variants MOGASd is found to give the best results for the test problems.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 595
页数:16
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Beume N.(2007)SMS-EMOA: multi-objective selection based on dominated hypervolume Eur. J. Oper. Res. 181 1653-1669
[2]  
Naujoks B.(2000)Approximating the nondominated front using the pareto archive evolutionary strategy Evol. Comput. 8 149-172
[3]  
Emmerich M.(1995)Simulated binary crossover for continuous search space Complex Syst. 9 115-148
[4]  
Knowles J.D.(1996)A combined genetic adaptive search (GeneAS) for engineering design Comput. Sci. Inform. 26 30-45
[5]  
Corne D.W.(2000)Multi-objective evolutionary computation for supersonic wing-shape optimization IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 4 182-187
[6]  
Deb K.(2000)Comparison of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms: empirical results Evol. Comput. J. 8 125-148
[7]  
Agrawal R.B.(2003)Performance assessment of multi-objective optimizers: an analysis and review IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 7 117-132
[8]  
Deb K.(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[9]  
Goyal M.(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[10]  
Obayashi S.(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined