Comparison of complication rates related to male urethral slings and artificial urinary sphincters for urinary incontinence: national multi-institutional analysis of ACS-NSQIP database

[1] Abrams P(2010)Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence Recommendations of the International Scientific Committee: evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and fecal incontinence Neurourol Urodyn 29 213-240

[2] Andersson KE(2013)Update in management of male urinary incontinence: injectables, balloons, minimally invasive approaches Curr Opin Urol 23 536-539

[3] Birder L(2013)Trends in the use of incontinence procedures after radical prostatectomy: a population based analysis J Urol 189 602-608

[4] Brubaker L(2012)EAU guidelines on surgical treatment of urinary incontinence Eur Urol 62 1118-1129

[5] Cardozo L(2013)The artificial urinary sphincter after a quarter of a century: a critical systematic review of its use in male non-neurogenic incontinence Eur Urol 63 681-689

[6] Chapple C(2014)Review: the use of sling versus sphincter in postprostatectomy urinary incontinence BJU Int 116 330-342

[7] Cornu JN(2012)Current trends in the management of post-prostatectomy incontinence Korean J Urol 53 511-518

[8] Peyrat L(2012)Treatment of postprostatectomy male urinary incontinence with the transobturator retroluminal repositioning sling suspension: 3-year follow-up Eur Urol 62 140-145

[9] Haab F(2008)The inside-out trans-obturator sling: a novel surgical technique for the treatment of male urinary incontinence Eur Urol 54 1051-1065

[10] Kim PH(2010)Complications of the AdVance transobturator male sling in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence Urology 75 1494-1498

[1] Abrams P(2010)Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence Recommendations of the International Scientific Committee: evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and fecal incontinence Neurourol Urodyn 29 213-240

[2] Andersson KE(2013)Update in management of male urinary incontinence: injectables, balloons, minimally invasive approaches Curr Opin Urol 23 536-539

[3] Birder L(2013)Trends in the use of incontinence procedures after radical prostatectomy: a population based analysis J Urol 189 602-608

[4] Brubaker L(2012)EAU guidelines on surgical treatment of urinary incontinence Eur Urol 62 1118-1129

[5] Cardozo L(2013)The artificial urinary sphincter after a quarter of a century: a critical systematic review of its use in male non-neurogenic incontinence Eur Urol 63 681-689

[6] Chapple C(2014)Review: the use of sling versus sphincter in postprostatectomy urinary incontinence BJU Int 116 330-342

[7] Cornu JN(2012)Current trends in the management of post-prostatectomy incontinence Korean J Urol 53 511-518

[8] Peyrat L(2012)Treatment of postprostatectomy male urinary incontinence with the transobturator retroluminal repositioning sling suspension: 3-year follow-up Eur Urol 62 140-145

[9] Haab F(2008)The inside-out trans-obturator sling: a novel surgical technique for the treatment of male urinary incontinence Eur Urol 54 1051-1065

[10] Kim PH(2010)Complications of the AdVance transobturator male sling in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence Urology 75 1494-1498