First trimester pregnancy ultrasound findings as a function of method of conception in an infertile population

[1] Conrad KP(2013)Corpus luteal contribution to maternal pregnancy physiology and outcomes in assisted reproductive technologies Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Phys 304 69-72

[2] Baker VL(2012)Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis Hum Reprod Update 18 485-503

[3] Pandey S(2013)Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction technology have adverse perinatal outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis Hum Reprod Update 19 87-104

[4] Shetty A(2016)Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of cohort studies Fertil Steril 105 73-85

[5] Hamilton M(2011)Smaller fetal size in singletons after infertility therapies: the influence of technology and the underlying infertility Fertil Steril 96 1100-1106

[6] Bhattacharya S(2014)The influence of IVF/ICSI treatment on human embryonic growth trajectories Hum Reprod 29 2628-2636

[7] Maheshwari A(2016)Influence of medically assisted reproduction techniques on crown-rump length and biochemical markers of trisomy 21 in the first trimester of pregnancy Fertil Steril 105 410-416

[8] Pinborg A(2016)Maternal and perinatal outcomes after fresh versus frozen embryo transfer—what is the risk-benefit ratio? Fertil Steril 106 241-243

[9] Wennerholm UB(2011)Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer in normal responders Fertil Steril 96 344-348

[10] Romundstad LB(2012)Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of frozen thawed versus fresh embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis Fertil Steril 98 368-377

[1] Conrad KP(2013)Corpus luteal contribution to maternal pregnancy physiology and outcomes in assisted reproductive technologies Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Phys 304 69-72

[2] Baker VL(2012)Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis Hum Reprod Update 18 485-503

[3] Pandey S(2013)Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction technology have adverse perinatal outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis Hum Reprod Update 19 87-104

[4] Shetty A(2016)Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of cohort studies Fertil Steril 105 73-85

[5] Hamilton M(2011)Smaller fetal size in singletons after infertility therapies: the influence of technology and the underlying infertility Fertil Steril 96 1100-1106

[6] Bhattacharya S(2014)The influence of IVF/ICSI treatment on human embryonic growth trajectories Hum Reprod 29 2628-2636

[7] Maheshwari A(2016)Influence of medically assisted reproduction techniques on crown-rump length and biochemical markers of trisomy 21 in the first trimester of pregnancy Fertil Steril 105 410-416

[8] Pinborg A(2016)Maternal and perinatal outcomes after fresh versus frozen embryo transfer—what is the risk-benefit ratio? Fertil Steril 106 241-243

[9] Wennerholm UB(2011)Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer in normal responders Fertil Steril 96 344-348

[10] Romundstad LB(2012)Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of frozen thawed versus fresh embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis Fertil Steril 98 368-377