Does pregnancy affect vascular enhancement in patients undergoing CT pulmonary angiography?

被引:0
作者
Adrian K. Andreou
John J. Curtin
Sue Wilde
Allan Clark
机构
[1] Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust,School of Medicine, Health Policy and Practice
[2] University of East Anglia,undefined
[3] Radiology Academy,undefined
[4] Cotman Centre,undefined
来源
European Radiology | 2008年 / 18卷
关键词
Pregnancy; Pulmonary embolism; CT pulmonary angiography;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study was to evaluate whether pregnancy affects contrast enhancement within the pulmonary arteries during computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA). This was a retrospective analysis of the CTPA examinations of 16 pregnant and 16 non-pregnant female patients, suspected of having an acute pulmonary embolus (PE), during the same time period. Pulmonary vascular enhancement was evaluated by measuring the CT density within the pulmonary arteries. In a blinded evaluation, subjective grading of contrast enhancement within the pulmonary arteries was also performed. There was a significant difference in arterial enhancement between the two groups, with pregnant patients having a mean pulmonary arterial density 112 HU less than patients in the control group [mean attenuation of 259.79 ± 59.31 HU in pregnant patients versus 371.88 ± 60.63 HU in non-pregnant patients (p < 0.001)]. The mean subjective pulmonary arterial enhancement score in the pregnant group was 8.19 ± 2.51 versus 13.69 ± 3.07 in the control group (p < 0.001). Pregnant women undergoing CTPA have significantly decreased pulmonary arterial enhancement compared to non-pregnant patients, probably due to the increase in cardiac output in pregnancy. We may need to reconsider how we perform CTPA in this group in order to ensure adequate opacification for diagnosis.
引用
收藏
页码:2716 / 2722
页数:6
相关论文
共 156 条
  • [1] Rochat RW(1988)Maternal mortality in the United States: report from the Maternal Mortality Collaborative Obstet Gynecol 72 91-97
  • [2] Koonin LM(1992)Maternal and perinatal mortality Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 4 61-71
  • [3] Atrash HK(1986)NIH Consensus Development JAMA 256 744-749
  • [4] Jewett JF(1996)Venous thromboembolism during pregnancy N Engl J Med 335 108-114
  • [5] Atrash HK(2000)Pulmonary embolism revealed on helical CT angiography: comparison with ventilation-perfusion radionuclide lung scanning AJR Am J Roentgenol 174 1041-1047
  • [6] Rowley D(2000)Clinical value in the thin collimation diagnostic workup of pulmonary embolism AJR Am J Roentgenol 175 407-411
  • [7] Hogue CJR(2005)Clinical validity of a negative computed tomography scan in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a systematic review JAMA 293 2012-2017
  • [8] Toglia MR(2002)How we manage venous thromboembolism in pregnancy Blood 100 3470-3478
  • [9] Weg JG(1998)Pulmonary embolism: diagnosis with spiral CT and ventilation-perfusion scanning–correlation with pulmonary angiographic results or clinical outcome Radiology 208 201-208
  • [10] Blachere H(2001)Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with use of computed tomographic angiography Mayo Clin Proc 76 59-65