Business processes in the agile organisation: a socio-technical perspective

被引:0
作者
Charles Crick
Eng K. Chew
机构
[1] University of Technology,
来源
Software & Systems Modeling | 2017年 / 16卷
关键词
Socio-technical systems; Organisational agility; Business process; Technology affordance;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper takes a cross-disciplinary view of the ontology of “business process”: how the concept is treated in the IS research literature and how related concepts (with stronger human behavioural orientation) from organisation and management sciences can potentially inform this IS perspective. In particular, is there room for socio-technical concepts such as technology affordance, derived from the constructivist tradition, in improving our understanding of operational business processes, particularly human-centric business processes? The paper presents a theoretical framework for understanding the role of business processes in organisational agility that distinguishes between the process-as-designed and the process-as-practiced. How this practice aspect of business processes also leads to the improvisation of various information technology enablers, is explored using a socio-technical lens. The posited theoretical framework is illustrated and validated with data drawn from an interpretive empirical case study of a large IT services company. The research suggests that processes within the organisation evolve both by top-down design and by the bottom-up routinisation of practice and that the tension between these is driven by the need for flexibility.
引用
收藏
页码:631 / 648
页数:17
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]  
Sambamurthy V(2003)Shaping agility through digital options: reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms MIS Q. 27 237-263
[2]  
Bharadwaj A(2007)Information technology and the changing fabric of organization Organ. Sci. 18 749-762
[3]  
Grover V(2007)The trouble with enterprise software MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 49 22-27
[4]  
Zammuto RF(2003)The alignment paradox CIO Insight 1 75-118
[5]  
Griffith TL(2003)Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change Adm. Sci. Q. 48 94-959
[6]  
Majchrzak A(2000)The evolution of firm capabilities Strateg. Manag. J. 21 955-1250
[7]  
Dougherty DJ(2011)Untangling dynamic and operational capabilities: strategy for the (n)ever-changing world Strateg. Manag. J. 32 1243-815
[8]  
Faraj S(2005)Organizational routines as a unit of analysis Ind. Corp. Change 14 793-167
[9]  
Rettig C(2011)When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies MIS Q. 35 147-433
[10]  
Tallon P(2010)Integrating modernist and postmodernist perspectives on organizations: a complexity science bridge Acad. Manag. Rev. 35 415-635