Institutions, Labor Mobility, and Foreign Direct Investment in China and India

被引:0
作者
Yu Zheng
机构
[1] Fudan University,
来源
Studies in Comparative International Development | 2016年 / 51卷
关键词
China; India; Foreign direct investment; Economic development; Domestic institutions; Labor mobility;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Why did China and India, despite their similar natural factor endowments and growth trajectories, attract different types of FDI? This article shows that microlevel institutions in China and India, particularly a set of regulations governing labor and land markets, shape their domestic labor mobility and consequently affect their FDI patterns and development paths. China’s high labor mobility motivates foreign firms to concentrate in labor-intensive manufacturing and exploit the benefits of scale economies. India’s low labor mobility motivates foreign firms to move away from unskilled-labor-intensive manufacturing and invest in the modern service sector where the demand for skilled labor is relatively high.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 168
页数:21
相关论文
共 76 条
  • [1] Acemoglu D(2005)Unbundling institutions J Polit Econ 113 949-95
  • [2] Johnson S(2006)Special economic zones: revisiting the policy debate Econ Pol Wkly 4 4533-6
  • [3] Aggarwal A(2009)Are all labor regulations equal? Evidence from Indian manufacturing J Comp Econ 37 62-75
  • [4] Ahsan A(2012)Skill distribution and comparative advantage: a comparison of China and India World Dev 40 956-69
  • [5] Pagés C(1996)Democracy and growth J Econ Growth 1 1-27
  • [6] Asuyama Y(1995)Property rights and investment incentives J Polit Econ 103 903-37
  • [7] Barro R(2004)Can labor regulation hinder economic performance? Evidence from India Quart J Econ 119 91-134
  • [8] Besley T(2004)The regulation of labor Quart J Econ 119 1339-82
  • [9] Besley T(2001)The U.S. Structural transformation and regional convergence: a reinterpretation J Polit Econ 109 584-616
  • [10] Burgess R(2010)A China paradox: migrant labor shortage amidst rural labor supply abundance Eur Geograph Econ 51 513-30