Pulmonary toxicity in patients treated with gemcitabine plus vinorelbine or docetaxel for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: outcome data on a randomized phase II study

被引:0
作者
Emilio Esteban
Noemi Villanueva
Isabel Muñiz
Yolanda Fernández
Joaquin Fra
Maria Luque
Paula Jiménez
Beatriz Llorente
Marta Capelan
José M. Vieitez
Enrique Estrada
José M. Buesa
Angel Jiménez-Lacave
机构
[1] Hospital Central de Asturias,Servicio de Oncología Médica
来源
Investigational New Drugs | 2008年 / 26卷
关键词
Non-small-cell lung cancer; Vinorelbine; Gemcitabine; Docetaxel; Pulmonary toxicity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Studies with the gemcitabine/vinorelbine (GV) or the gemcitabine/docetaxel (GD) combinations have shown similar efficacy and less toxicity compared to platinum-based chemotherapies, in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The present trial was designed to test the efficacy and safety of both, GV and GD, combinations. Chemotherapy-naïve patients (n = 39) ≤75 years of age, KPS ≥ 60% and adequate hematological, renal and hepatic function were randomly assigned to receive G 1,000 mg/m2 + either V 25 mg/m2 or D 35 mg/m2 (all of which were administered i.v.) on days 1 and 8 every 21 days. Baseline characteristics were comparable in GV (n = 20) and GD (n = 19) groups. Results indicated objective response of 7 (35%) vs 6 (31%) patients and median time-to-treatment failure of 120 versus 90 days in the GV and GD arms, respectively. The most common non-hematological toxicities were (GV vs GD): grade 2–4 pulmonary toxicity in 1 (5%) vs 7 (37%); grade 2–3 diarrhea 0 versus 4 (21%) and edema 1 (5%) vs 3 (16%); grade 3–4 hematological toxicities occurred in 3 (15%) vs 1 (5%) patients. Our results indicate that the combination of gemcitabine/docetaxel does not have a favorable safety profile with this schedule of administration, particularly in terms of pulmonary toxicity.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 74
页数:7
相关论文
共 519 条
[1]  
Gatzemeier U(1996)Activity of gemcitabine in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a multicentre extended phase II study Eur J Cancer 32A 243-248
[2]  
Shepherd FA(1994)Efficacy and safety profile of gemcitabine in non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study J Clin Oncol 12 1535-1540
[3]  
Le Chevalier T(1994)Single-agent activity of weekly gemcitabine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study J Clin Oncol 12 1821-1826
[4]  
Weynants P(1991)A phase II study of Navelbine (vinorelbine) in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer Am J Clin Oncol 14 115-119
[5]  
Cottier B(1999)Effects of vinorelbine on quality of life and survival of elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer J Natl Cancer Inst 91 66-72
[6]  
Groen HJ(2000)Gemcitabine plus best supportive care (BSC) versus BSC in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer—a randomized trial with quality of life as the primary outcome. UK NSCLC Gemcitabine Group. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Br J Cancer 83 447-453
[7]  
Rosso R(1994)Docetaxel (Taxotere) is active in non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II trial of the EORTC Early Clinical Trial Group (ECTG) Br J Cancer 70 384-387
[8]  
Mattson K(2000)A multicenter, randomized, phase III study of docetaxel plus best supportive care versus best supportive care in chemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic or non-resectable localized non-small-cell lung cancer Lung Cancer 27 145-157
[9]  
Cortes-Funes H(1994)Randomized study of vinorelbine and cisplatin versus vindesine and cisplatin versus vinorelbine alone in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a European multicenter trial including 612 patients J Clin Oncol 12 360-367
[10]  
Tonato M(1999)Randomized phase III study of gemcitabine–cisplatin versus etoposide–cisplatin in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer J Clin Oncol 17 12-18