A review of methods for monitoring streamflow for sustainable water resource management

被引:92
作者
Dobriyal P. [1 ]
Badola R. [1 ]
Tuboi C. [1 ]
Hussain S.A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wildlife Institute of India, Post Box # 18, Chandrabani, Dehra Dun, 248001, Uttarakhand
关键词
Climate change; Ecosystem services; Fresh water; Streamflow monitoring; Water resource management;
D O I
10.1007/s13201-016-0488-y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Monitoring of streamflow may help to determine the optimum levels of its use for sustainable water management in the face of climate change. We reviewed available methods for monitoring streamflow on the basis of six criteria viz. their applicability across different terrains and size of the streams, operational ease, time effectiveness, accuracy, environmental impact that they may cause and cost involve in it. On the basis of the strengths and weaknesses of each of the methods reviewed, we conclude that the timed volume method is apt for hilly terrain having smaller streams due to its operational ease and accuracy of results. Although comparatively expensive, the weir and flume methods are suitable for long term studies of small hill streams, since once the structure is put in place, it yields accurate results. In flat terrain, the float method is best suited for smaller streams for its operational ease and cost effectiveness, whereas, for larger streams, the particle image velocimetry may be used for its accuracy. Our review suggests that the selection of a method for monitoring streamflow may be based on volume of the stream, accuracy of the method, accessibility of the terrain and financial and physical resources available. © 2016, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:2617 / 2628
页数:11
相关论文
共 129 条
[1]  
Acreman M.C., Ethical aspects of water and ecosystems, Wat Policy J, 3, pp. 257-265, (2001)
[2]  
Adrian R.J., Westerweel J., Particle image velocimetry (vol 30), (2011)
[3]  
Ancey C., Davison A.C., Bohm T., Jodeau M., Frey P., Entrainment and motion of coarse particles in a shallow water stream down a steep slope, J Fluid Mech, 595, pp. 83-114, (2008)
[4]  
Baffaut C., Sadler E.J., Ghidey F., Long-term agroecosystem research in the central Mississippi river basin: goodwater creek experimental watershed flow data, J Environ Quality, 44, 1, pp. 18-27, (2015)
[5]  
Baker J.M., Measurement of soil water content, Remote Sens Rev, 5, pp. 263-279, (1990)
[6]  
Baltas E.A., Climate change and associated implications for the water policy framework in the basin of Venetikos, Int J Wat Resources Develop, 25, 3, pp. 491-506, (2009)
[7]  
Barnett T.P., Adam J.C., Lettenmaier D.P., Potential impacts of a warming climate on water availability in snow-dominated regions, Nature, 438, 7066, pp. 303-309, (2005)
[8]  
Barrows C.J., River basin development planning and management: a critical review, World Dev, 26, 1, pp. 171-186, (1998)
[9]  
Bates B.C., Kundzewicz Z.W., Wu S., Palutikof JP (eds), (2008)
[10]  
Batra N., Islam S., Venturini V., Bisht G., Jiang L.E., Estimation and comparison of evapotranspiration from MODIS and AVHRR sensors for clear sky days over the Southern Great Plains, Remote Sens Environ, 103, 1, pp. 1-15, (2006)