Assessing the readability of mental health internet brochures for children and adolescents

被引：0
作者：
Maia M. King
Alan S.W. Winton
Angela D. Adkins
机构：
[1] Department of Psychiatry, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
[2] Department of Psychology, Massey University, Palmerston North
[3] Western State Hospital, Staunton, VA
[4] Department of Psychology, Western State Hospital, Staunton, VA 24402-2500
来源：
Journal of Child and Family Studies | 2003年 / 12卷 / 1期
关键词：
Center for Mental Health Service; Mental health brochures; Readability; Readability Assessment Instrument (RAIN); Reading grade level;
D O I：
10.1023/A:1021362210470
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
We investigated the readability of seven mental health brochures on mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders in children that were selected from a website developed by the Center for Mental Health Services at www.mentalhealth.org. The reading grade levels of the brochures ranged from 11.1 to 14.8 (mean 13.23), considerably higher than the 8th grade level recommended for educational material by the U. S. Department of Education (1986). On other readability variables, assessed using the Readability Assessment Instrument (RAIN; Singh, 1994), all brochures met criterion on most variables but failed on those for new words (audience appropriateness) and print size. This is a favorable result in comparison with other studies that have assessed readability of mental health information on the Internet using the RAIN, although less so with reading grade levels.
引用
收藏
页码：91 / 99
页数：8
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Adkins A.D., Elkins E.N., Singh N.N., Readability of NIMH Easy-to-Read patient education materials, Journal of Child and Family Studies, 10, pp. 279-285, (2001)
  • [2] Adkins A.D., Singh N.N., Reading level and readability of patient education materials in mental health, Journal of Child and Family Studies, 10, pp. 1-8, (2001)
  • [3] Adkins A.D., Singh N.N., McKeegan G.F., Lanier A.E., Oswald D.P., Behavior treatment programs, readability and treatment outcomes, Research in Developmental Disabilities, 23, pp. 253-265, (2002)
  • [4] Albright J., De Guzman C., Acebo P., Paiva D., Faulkner M., Swanson J., Readability of patient education materials: Implications for clinical practice, Applied Nurse Research, 9, pp. 139-143, (1996)
  • [5] Berland G.K., Elliott M.N., Morales L.S., Algazy J.I., Kravitz R.L., Broder M.S., Kanouse D.E., Munoz J.A., Puyol J., Lara M., Watkins K.E., Yang H., McGlynn E.A., Health information on the Internet: Accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish, The Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, pp. 2612-2638, (2001)
  • [6] Dollahite J., Thompson C., McNew R., Readability of printed sources of diet and health information, Patient Education and Counseling, 27, pp. 123-134, (1996)
  • [7] Doak L.G., Doak C.C., Lowering the silent barriers to compliance for patients with low literacy skills, Promoting Health, 8, pp. 6-8, (1987)
  • [8] Estey A., Musseau A., Keehn L., Patient's understanding of health information: A multi-hospital comparison, Patient Education and Counseling, 24, pp. 73-78, (1994)
  • [9] Glanz K., Rudd J., Readability and content analysis of print cholesterol education materials, Patient Education and Counseling, 16, pp. 109-118, (1990)
  • [10] Graber M.A., Roller C.M., Kaeble B., Readability levels of patient education material on the World Wide Web, The Journal of Family Practice, 48, pp. 58-61, (1999)
12