3D printing as an educational technology: theoretical perspectives, learning outcomes, and recommendations for practice

被引:0
作者
Heather Ann Pearson
Adam Kenneth Dubé
机构
[1] McGill University,Department of Educational & Counselling Psychology
来源
Education and Information Technologies | 2022年 / 27卷
关键词
3D printing; Self-directed learning; Constructionism; Educational technology; Critical making;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
3D printing is an emerging educational technology that is said to prepare learners for a more technologically designed world. In this review, 3D printing studies are analyzed to identify the dominant theoretical approaches and learning outcomes associated with 3D printing in education. Five theories are identified, including situated learning (Lave & Wenger, 1991), experiential learning (Kolb & Kolb Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4, 193- 212, Kolb & Kolb, 2005), and critical making (Ratto in The Information Society, 27, 252-260, 2011), but concepts from constructionism (Papert & Harel Constructionism, 36, 1-11, 1991) and self-directed learning (Garrison Adult Education Quarterly, 48, 18-33, 1997; Knowles, 1975) are common amongst all approaches. Learning outcomes attributed to 3D printing include critical thinking, creativity, design thinking, and collaboration (Trust et al., 2018; Trust & Maloy Computers in the Schools: Interdisciplinary Journal of Practice, Theory, and Applied Research, 34, 253-266, 2017), with proponents arguing that the domain general outcomes go beyond knowing simply how to use a 3D printer. Given the identified, theoretical approaches, outcomes, and common barriers to use, recommendations are made for how educators approach and implement 3D printing in the classroom.
引用
收藏
页码:3037 / 3064
页数:27
相关论文
共 108 条
[1]  
Ackermann E(2001)Piaget’s constructivism, Papert’s constructionism: What’s the difference Future of learning group publication 5 3-38
[2]  
Ainley J(2006)Connecting engagement and focus in pedagogic task design British Educational Research Journal 32 23-28
[3]  
Pratt D(2016)Investigating the implications of 3D printing in special education ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 8 1-1064
[4]  
Hansen A(2017)The different learning outcomes of high school and college students on a 3D-printing STEAM engineering design curriculum International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 16 1047-29
[5]  
Buehler E(1994)Media will never influence learning Educational Technology Research & Development 42 21-438
[6]  
Comrie N(2017)Educators’ perceptions of a maker-based learning experience The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology 34 428-86
[7]  
Hofmann M(2015)Creating a prosthetic hand: 3D printers innovate and inspire a maker movement Science and Children 53 80-141
[8]  
McDonald S(2017)Self-directed learning characteristics: Making learning personal, empowering and successful Africa Education Review 14 122-13
[9]  
Hurst A(2013)3D printing for children: What to build next? International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 1 7-64
[10]  
Chien Y-H(2018)3D-printed specimens as a valuable tool in anatomy education: A pilot study Annals of Anatomy 219 57-33