Response of the primary lesion in gastric cancer to chemotherapeutic trials

被引:6
作者
Ohtsu A. [1 ,5 ]
Boku N. [1 ]
Yoshida S. [1 ]
Miyata Y. [2 ]
Shirao K. [3 ]
Shimada Y. [3 ]
Kurihara M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Department of Internal Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa
[2] Department of Internal Medicine, Saku Central Hospital, Nagano Prefecture
[3] Department of Internal Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo
[4] Department of Gastroenterology, Toyosu Hospital, Showa University, Tokyo
[5] Department of Internal Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa 277-8577
关键词
Chemotherapy; Evaluation criteria; Gastric cancer; Survival;
D O I
10.1007/BF02490094
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: We wish to clarify some points in the evaluation of primary tumors in gastric cancer trials, particularly the response rate and patient survival. Methods: This study includes 226 patients with advanced gastric cancer who had no prior treatment except surgery, and who had been enrolled into 1 of 4 Japan Clinical Oncology Group trials. The regimens for these 226 patients were tegafur and mitomycin C in 50, a combination of tegafur and uracil and mitomycin C in 39, 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine and cisplatin in 49, etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in 42, and 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin in 46 patients. Antitumor responses were evaluated by the Japanese evaluation criteria. Results: Of the 226 patients, 192 (85%) had primary cancers. Only 57 of 192 had roentgenographically measurable tumors. The response rate of the primary cancers was significantly lower than that of measurable metastatic lesions (P < 0.01). Forty-five overall responders who had both primary and metastatic tumors were divided into 31 responders and 14 nonresponders, with reference to primary cancers. The 31 patients who had a response in the primary cancer lived significantly longer (P< 0.05) than the 14 nonresponders, even though there was no significant difference in patient backgrounds between the 2 groups. This difference in survival became even more remarkable after 1 year. Conclusions: Although some questions remain unresolved, evaluation of primary cancer can be meaningful, and the response of primary cancers may be an indicator for long-term survival.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 6
页数:3
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
General Rules for Gastric Cancer Study. 11th Ed., (1985)
[2]  
Kurihara M., Izumi T., Yoshida S., Ohkubo T., Suga S., Kiyohashi A., Yaosaka T., Takahashi H., Ito T., Sasai T., Akiya T., Akazawa S., Betsuyaku T., Taguchi S., A cooperative randomized study on tegafur plus mitomycin C versus combined tegafur and uracil plus mitomycin C in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer, Jpn J Cancer Res, 82, pp. 613-620, (1991)
[3]  
Koizumi W., Kurihara M., Sasai T., Yoshida S., Morise K., Imamura A., Akazawa S., Betsuyaku T., Ohkubo S., Takahashi H., Akiya T., Hamada T., Kiyohashi A., A phase II study of combination therapy with 5′-deoxy-5-fluorouridine and cisplatin in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer with primary foci, Cancer, 72, pp. 658-662, (1993)
[4]  
Shimada Y., Yoshida S., Ohtsu A., Seki S., Saito H., A phase II study of EAP (etoposide, adriamycin and cisplatin) in the patients with advanced gastric cancer: Multiinstitutional study, J Jpn Soc Cancer Ther, 26, (1991)
[5]  
Ohtsu A., Shimada Y., Yoshida S., Saito H., Seki S., Morise K., Kurihara K., Phase II study of protracted infusional 5-fluorouracil combined with cisplatinum for advanced gastric cancer: Report from the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG), Eur J Cancer, 30 A, pp. 2091-2093, (1994)
[6]  
Kaplan E., Meier P., Nonparametric estimation for incomplete observations, J Am Stat Assoc, 53, pp. 457-481, (1958)
[7]  
O'Connel M.J., Etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: An old lesson revisited, J Clin Oncol, 10, (1991)
[8]  
Jett J.R., Su J.Q., Krook J.E., Goldberg R.M., Kugler J.W., Measurable or assessable disease in lung cancer trials: Does it matter?, J Clin Oncol, 12, pp. 2677-2681, (1994)