Prospective assessment of quality of life after auricular reconstruction with porous polyethylene; [Prospektive Erfassung der Lebensqualität nach Ohrmuschelrekonstruktion mit porösem Polyethylen]

被引:0
作者
Hempel J.M. [1 ]
Knöbl D. [1 ]
Berghaus A. [1 ]
Braun T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-, Nasen-, Ohrenheilkunde, Klinikum der Universität München, 81377 München
关键词
Auricular reconstruction; Microtia; Morbidity; Porous polyethylene; Quality of life;
D O I
10.1007/s00106-014-2833-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Microtia is associated with increased psychosocial morbidity. The literature contains three purely retrospective studies using validated tools. These studies show that auricular reconstruction leads to a significant improvement in health-related quality of life in affected children and adults. Methods: In a prospective approach, the authors assessed 21 consecutive microtia patients (return rate 81 %; 7 children and 10 adults) before and after auricular reconstruction with porous polyethylene using the following validated questionnaires: Glasgow Health Status Inventory (GHSI), Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36), Childhood Experiences Questionnaire (CEQ) and Kidscreen-52. Results: An improved health-related quality of life was detected with all applied instruments. Conclusion: A subjective benefit of auricular reconstruction with porous polyethylene can be shown using prospective, as well retrospective tools. © 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
引用
收藏
页码:564 / 569
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Fischer D., Stewart A.L., Bloch D.A., Et al., Capturing the patient's view of change as a clinical outcome measure, JAMA, 282, pp. 1157-1162, (1999)
  • [2] Guyatt G.H., Feeny D.H., Patrick D.L., Measuring health-related quality of life, Ann Intern Med, 118, pp. 622-629, (1993)
  • [3] Gatehouse S., The Glasgow Health Status Questionnaires Manual, (1998)
  • [4] Braun T., Gratza S., Becker S., Et al., Auricular reconstruction with porous polyethylene frameworks: Outcome and patient benefit in 65 children and adults, Plast Reconstr Surg, 126, pp. 1201-1212, (2010)
  • [5] Braun T., Gratza S., Berghaus A., Et al., Patient benefit from ear reconstruction with porous polyethylene in severe cases of hemifacial microsomia, Eur J Plast Surg, 36, pp. 219-224, (2013)
  • [6] Soukup B., Mashhadi S.A., Bulstrode N.W., Health-related quality-of-life assessment and surgical outcomes for auricular reconstruction using autologous costal cartilage, Plast Reconstr Surg, 129, pp. 632-640, (2012)
  • [7] Berghaus A., Porecon implant and fan flap: A concept for reconstruction of the auricle, Facial Plast Surg, 5, pp. 451-457, (1988)
  • [8] Reinisch J.F., Lewin S., Ear reconstruction using a porous polyethylene framework and temporoparietal fascia flap, Facial Plast Surg, 25, pp. 181-189, (2009)
  • [9] Collar R.M., Zopf D., Brown D., Et al., The versatility of the temporoparietal fascia flap in head and neck reconstruction, J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 65, pp. 141-148, (2012)
  • [10] Jenkinson C., Coulter A., Wright L., Short form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaire: Normative data for adults of working age, BMJ, 306, pp. 1437-1440, (1993)