Improving primary care identification of familial breast cancer risk using proactive invitation and decision support

被引:0
作者
Nadeem Qureshi
Brittany Dutton
Stephen Weng
Christina Sheehan
Wendy Chorley
John F. R. Robertson
Denise Kendrick
Joe Kai
机构
[1] University of Nottingham,Division of Primary Care, NIHR School for Primary Care Research, School of Medicine
[2] Royal Derby Hospital,University Hospitals Derby & Burton NHS Foundation Trust
[3] University of Nottingham,School of Medicine
来源
Familial Cancer | 2021年 / 20卷
关键词
Primary health care; Breast cancer; Family history; Medical genetics; Decision support; Risk assessment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Family history of breast cancer is a key risk factor, accounting for up to 10% of cancers. We evaluated the proactive assessment of familial breast cancer (FBC) risk in primary care. Eligible women (30 to 60 years) were recruited from eight English general practices. Practices were trained on FBC risk assessment. In four randomly-assigned practices, women were invited to complete a validated, postal family history questionnaire, which practice staff inputted into decision support software to determine cancer risk. Those with increased risk were offered specialist referral. Usual care was observed in the other four practices. In intervention practices, 1127/7012 women (16.1%) returned family history questionnaires, comprising 1105 (98%) self-reported white ethnicity and 446 (39.6%) educated to University undergraduate or equivalent qualification, with 119 (10.6%) identified at increased breast cancer risk and offered referral. Sixty-seven (56%) women recommended referral were less than 50 years old. From 66 women attending specialists, 26 (39.4%) were confirmed to have high risk and recommended annual surveillance (40–60 years) and surgical prevention; while 30 (45.5%) were confirmed at moderate risk, with 19 offered annual surveillance (40–50 years). The remaining 10 (15.2%) managed in primary care. None were recommended chemoprevention. In usual care practices, only ten women consulted with concerns about breast cancer family history. This study demonstrated proactive risk assessment in primary care enables accurate identification of women, including many younger women, at increased risk of breast cancer. To improve generalisability across the population, more active methods of engagement need to be explored.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 21
页数:8
相关论文
共 295 条
[1]  
Ginsburg O(2017)The global burden of women’s cancers: a grand challenge in global health Lancet 10071 847-860
[2]  
Bray F(2002)Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials Lancet 9310 909-919
[3]  
Coleman MP(2012)The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review Lancet 9855 1778-1786
[4]  
Vanderpuye V(2006)Origins of socio-economic inequalities in cancer survival: a review Ann Oncol 1 5-19
[5]  
Eniu A(2008)Recurrence pattern and prognosis in low-risk breast cancer patients–data from the DBCG 89—a programme Acta Oncol 4 691-703
[6]  
Kotha SR(2009)Diagnosis of breast cancer in women age 40 and younger: delays in diagnosis result from underuse of genetic testing and breast imaging Am J Surg 4 538-543
[7]  
Sarker M(2011)Predictors of contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers Br J Cancer 9 1384-1392
[8]  
Huong TT(2002)Familial risks of breast cancer Breast Cancer Res 5 179-114
[9]  
Allemani C(2012)Familial breast cancer Clin Genet 2 105-83
[10]  
Dvaladze A(2002)A comprehensive model for familial breast cancer incorporating BRCA1, BRCA2 and other genes Br J Cancer 1 76-965